2011
DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2010.527119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home, Meaning and Identity: Learning from the English Model of Shared Ownership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the housing literature, the complex and layered nature of security has been highlighted in work on the meaning of 'home', which identifies the interrelationships between the physical dimensions of housing (such as basic safety and security) and the psycho-social dimensions of home such as privacy, emotional security and identity (Easthope, 2004;Gurney, 1997;Somerville, 1992). The literature on owner occupation also recognises different layers of security including financial security in respect of wealth and income over the life course (Bright & Hopkins, 2011), and the psycho-social dimensions of security, deploying concepts such as ontological security (Saunders, 1990), referring to satisfaction of a deep psychological need for a sense of security and constancy. The psycho-social aspects of security associated with owner occupation have been much debated with some empirical research also highlighting financial risks that can undermine psycho-social security (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the housing literature, the complex and layered nature of security has been highlighted in work on the meaning of 'home', which identifies the interrelationships between the physical dimensions of housing (such as basic safety and security) and the psycho-social dimensions of home such as privacy, emotional security and identity (Easthope, 2004;Gurney, 1997;Somerville, 1992). The literature on owner occupation also recognises different layers of security including financial security in respect of wealth and income over the life course (Bright & Hopkins, 2011), and the psycho-social dimensions of security, deploying concepts such as ontological security (Saunders, 1990), referring to satisfaction of a deep psychological need for a sense of security and constancy. The psycho-social aspects of security associated with owner occupation have been much debated with some empirical research also highlighting financial risks that can undermine psycho-social security (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Much of this writing questions the ideals of shared ownership, critiques the lease, and, as Susan Bright and Nick Hopkins have put it, the product is akin to the Emperor's New Clothes. 68 However, that critique of the label is to miss the point. The label shared ownership has particular power precisely because it conveys the idea that the buyer`owns' their share and that the buyer is on the ladder not to home ownership but of home ownership.…”
Section: The Mystery Of the Lease Uncovered?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Fox O'Mahony has used three housing paradigms as a tool for analysis: the house as home, as inheritance and as investment. While the extent to which the x‐factor values of ‘housing as home’ are enhanced by home‐ownership remains contested, the owned‐home alone confers the financial stake that lies at the heart of the paradigms of housing as an investment or inheritance; the home as an asset to be drawn upon by the owner or preserved and passed on. In the context of these paradigms, asset‐based welfare connects directly with housing as an investment to be drawn upon by the owner.…”
Section: Asset‐based Welfarementioning
confidence: 99%