Home -ing in on domestic energy research: “House,” “home,” and the importance of ontology

Abstract

a b s t r a c tDomestic energy demand is a topical policy issue, with implications for climate change, energy vulnerability and security. Domestic energy demand varies considerably by country, climate, building type, and even when these factors are the same, occupancy patterns and inhabitant's lifestyles also create variation. However, clarifying understanding of the basic locus of analysis: the home, house, dwelling, or household has received little attention to date, despite its relevance to debates on energy demand. This paper explores the theoretical and methodological assumptions of investigating the 'house' compared to the 'home' and the implications for domestic energy researchers. We suggest that the ontological priority given to the 'home' results in scholarship which considers both social and physical aspects that shape demand. Conversely, research prioritising the 'house' is dominated by techno-economic thinking, and overlooks critical social considerations. Recognising this important distinction, we conclude with a plea for scholars to be cognisant of ontology and language, and provide some suggestions for a future research agenda.

Winter cold in a summer place: Perceived norms of seasonal adaptation and cultures of home heating in Australia

“…Studies in this journal have already emphasised the importance of examining how cultural norms of domestic heat management can vary [11], the many skills people possess in terms of privately organising their winter warmth [12], and the significant energy use implications of how ideal domesticity is culturally defined [13]. Evidently there are many ways in which the social science of heat energy use at home might usefully move forward from this point.…”

Wild interdisciplinarity: ethnography and computer science

“…We were appraising the project through the eyes of the technologists not the members of the setting (Ellsworth-Krebs, Reid, & Hunter, 2015). Citizens were liable to be amongst the most marginalised of a marginalised community.…”

Critically Interrogating Eco‐Homes

“…Likewise, although there is a plethora of work examining environmentally sus tainable behaviour change in the household (Hobson, 2006;Barr et al, 2011;Ellsworth-Krebs et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2015), it is the work on social practices that has best examined the interdependency between the materiality of a house and its social rela tions. Social practices are understood to be influenced, shaped and limited by the mate rialities of an eco-home, which are in turn shaped by social norms, government structures and commercial aims (Reckwitz, 2002;Warde, 2005;Shove, 2006).…”