2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00228-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home cage activity and behavioral performance in inbred and hybrid mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
80
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
18
80
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the HA and OF tests conducted in this study, both sexes of the B6 mice exhibited higher values than the D2 and DBF 1 mice for all activity-related parameters; the DBF 1 mice showed values higher or similar to those of the D2 mice. These results are consistent with published strain comparisons: [26] for the HA test, and [3,13,24,26] for the OF test. For PA performance, D2 mice were the worst learners among the groups at both shock intensities for males and at 0.3 mA for females, whereas B6 mice were the worst learners at 0.15 mA for females in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the HA and OF tests conducted in this study, both sexes of the B6 mice exhibited higher values than the D2 and DBF 1 mice for all activity-related parameters; the DBF 1 mice showed values higher or similar to those of the D2 mice. These results are consistent with published strain comparisons: [26] for the HA test, and [3,13,24,26] for the OF test. For PA performance, D2 mice were the worst learners among the groups at both shock intensities for males and at 0.3 mA for females, whereas B6 mice were the worst learners at 0.15 mA for females in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The greater effects of CRH and AST on wakefulness and sleep in BALB/cJ mice compared to C57BL/6J mice are consistent with findings that BALB/cJ mice are more reactive in behavioral tests of anxiety (Belzung and Griebel, 2001;Tang et al, 2002b) and also show greater alterations in sleep in response to a number of stressors (Wurbel et al, 1998;Sanford et al, 2003a;2003b;2003d). Thus, strain differences in the effects of CRH and AST may be linked to underlying differences in the CRH system that may also be involved in the relative responsiveness to stressors in C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…LRS thresholds: 9.5 (suggestive), 16.5 (significant), and 26.4 (highly significant). Bouwknecht and Paylor, 2002), free-exploration tests (Kopp et al, 1999;Tang et al, 2002;Yilmazer-Hanke et al, 2003), the novel object test (Tang et al, 2002), and the elevated plus maze (Kim et al, 2002). The A/J mouse strain was selected because these mice: (1) were relatively nonresponsive to citalopram in the TST , (2) showing high levels of anxiety and defecation (Crawley et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%