2014
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2013.837891
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hollywood in the world market – evidence from Australia in the mid-1930s

Abstract: By the mid-1930s the major Hollywood studios had developed extensive networks of distribution subsidiaries across five continents. This paper focuses on the operation of American film distributors in Australia-one of Hollywood's largest foreign markets. Drawing on two unique primary datasets, the paper compares and investigates film distribution in Sydney's first-run and suburban-run markets. It finds that the subsidiaries of US film companies faced a greater liability of foreignness in the city centre market … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the local market level, spatial competition and ownership structures have been studied with respect to inter‐cinema programming decisions (Chisholm et al., 2010; Chisholm & Norman, 2012; Elizalde, 2013). Entry and exit decisions, as well as competition between city, suburban, and regional cinemas, have also provided research topics in both historical and contemporary contexts (Collins et al., 2009b; Gil & Marion, 2018; Orhun et al., 2016; Sedgwick et al., 2014; Takahashi, 2015). At the cinema level, applied and theoretical research examines the profit implications from common uniform ticket pricing practices of the industry (Chen, 2009; Choi et al., 2015; Courty & Nasiry, 2018; De Roos & McKenzie, 2014; Ho et al., 2018), as well as the relationships between geographic concentration of cinemas and ticket prices (Bohme & Muller, 2011).…”
Section: Movie Microeconomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the local market level, spatial competition and ownership structures have been studied with respect to inter‐cinema programming decisions (Chisholm et al., 2010; Chisholm & Norman, 2012; Elizalde, 2013). Entry and exit decisions, as well as competition between city, suburban, and regional cinemas, have also provided research topics in both historical and contemporary contexts (Collins et al., 2009b; Gil & Marion, 2018; Orhun et al., 2016; Sedgwick et al., 2014; Takahashi, 2015). At the cinema level, applied and theoretical research examines the profit implications from common uniform ticket pricing practices of the industry (Chen, 2009; Choi et al., 2015; Courty & Nasiry, 2018; De Roos & McKenzie, 2014; Ho et al., 2018), as well as the relationships between geographic concentration of cinemas and ticket prices (Bohme & Muller, 2011).…”
Section: Movie Microeconomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mollan andTennent (2015, p. 1058) note that the "trade press typically operated to supply practitioners with valuable information affecting their behaviour, giving us an insight into industry structure and practices". Sedgwick et al (2014) relied upon the Australian film industry's weekly trade journal Everyones to provide extensive qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate competition in international film distribution in the 1930s.…”
Section: Newspapersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Finally, Sedgwick has co-authored investigations into the American, Australian and British markets concerning the distribution of films and film popularity during this decade. 4 Taken as a whole, the research suggests that while the shape and function of cinema markets can be explained through economic principles, audience preferences as manifest in the listings of the most popular films is very much a cultural phenomenon.…”
Section: Josephmentioning
confidence: 99%