2002
DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055001602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
330
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 652 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
330
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Hofstede's model, based on comparisons and cultural distances between countries, has been criticised for its methodological development (Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006), in the formulation of the fifth dimension (Fang, 2003), because the consumer's behaviour does not always correspond to the differences between countries expressed by Hofstede (Yuksel, Kilinc, & Yuksel, 2006), or because nation cannot be equated with culture (McSweeney, 2002;Myers & Tan, 2003), but it is the model that has been most used to identify the cultural differences between countries (Soares, Farhangmehr, & Shoham, 2007) and that has most influenced cross-cultural management (Steenkamp, 2001 On the basis of these data, and following previous research (Liu, Furrer, & Sudharshan, 2001), we have taken into account for the interpretation of the results those two of Hofstede's dimensions in which these two groups are furthest apart in absolute values: individualism and uncertainty avoidance (see table 1).…”
Section: Cross-nationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hofstede's model, based on comparisons and cultural distances between countries, has been criticised for its methodological development (Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006), in the formulation of the fifth dimension (Fang, 2003), because the consumer's behaviour does not always correspond to the differences between countries expressed by Hofstede (Yuksel, Kilinc, & Yuksel, 2006), or because nation cannot be equated with culture (McSweeney, 2002;Myers & Tan, 2003), but it is the model that has been most used to identify the cultural differences between countries (Soares, Farhangmehr, & Shoham, 2007) and that has most influenced cross-cultural management (Steenkamp, 2001 On the basis of these data, and following previous research (Liu, Furrer, & Sudharshan, 2001), we have taken into account for the interpretation of the results those two of Hofstede's dimensions in which these two groups are furthest apart in absolute values: individualism and uncertainty avoidance (see table 1).…”
Section: Cross-nationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other theorists have also argued that some of Hofstede's (2007) data are contradictory within certain countries (McSweeney, 2002). Within the limited space available here, I aim to offer the reader the most thorough debate as possible on the UK construction sector itself, rather than include it within a broader brush of gender-themed research that covers other industries.…”
Section: Culture: Concept Origin and Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further examine the relationships between national culture and union membership, this study uses two different conceptualizations of culture: the Hofstede (2001) framework-which, although popular, has been criticized by some (McSweeney, 2002)-and the Global Leadership and organizational Behaviour Effectiveness (GLoBE) measures (House et al, 2004). The GLoBE measures overlap with, but are both conceptually and empirically distinguishable from, the Hofstede measures (Hofstede, 2001).…”
Section: Comparing Cultural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%