HIVE: Helping interdisciplinary vocabulary engineering

Greenberg, Jane; Losee, Robert M.; Agüera, José Ramón Pérez; Scherle, Ryan; White, Hollie; Willis, Craig

doi:10.1002/bult.2011.1720370407

Cited by 20 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) (Greenberg et al., ) supports SKOS‐based searching and browsing access to six controlled vocabularies. It also provides an automated indexing service whereby terms from the selected vocabularies are assigned to a document uploaded or found at a given URL.…”

Section: Research Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems: Functionality, use, and attributes

Golub

Tudhope

Zeng

et al. 2014

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine‐based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.

show abstract

Section: Research Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems: Functionality, use, and attributes

Golub

Tudhope

Zeng

et al. 2014

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…99 Projects like HIVE (Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering) are providing frameworks to enhance the integration of data repositories, libraries, and archives across multiple disciplines. 100 As emphasized by. 101 When "certain terms become more broadly applicable, there is more cross-communication between disciplines."…”

Section: Vocabulary Of Urban Socio-ecological Systemsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Urban Systems: A Socio-Ecological System Perspective

Frank¹,

Delano²,

Frank³

et al. 2017

SIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban areas are hot spots of complex and dynamic interactions between society and ecosystems. Studies on such areas, however, have partially captured the coupled socio-ecological nature of urban environments. To address this gap, we examine the ways natural and social scientists have defined, developed and implemented research on urban environments. We discuss how these literatures set the foundation and explicitly advance urban studies through the lens of urban socio-ecological systems. By bringing these literatures together we forge a common ground between scholarly communities and foster cross-fertilization between researchers working on cities. A better understanding of the commonalities and differences of these disciplines in approaching urban environments is the first step toward opening corridors for new lines of discussions that better encompass the role played by urban socio-ecological systems in shaping changes and long-term sustainability.

show abstract

“…Organisations are greatly impacted by the culture they follow. Greenberg et al (2011) arguing upon the signi¯cance of culture said that culture is an element that creates sense of loyalty in employees. Strong culture re°ects strong values to internal and external environments.…”

Section: Organisational Culturementioning

confidence: 99%