Abstract:This scoping review aims to explore the interplay between substance use (SU) and HIV in Latin America (LA). Database searches yielded 3481 references; 196 were included. HIV prevalence among people who used substances (PWUS) ranged from 2.8–15.2%. SU definitions were variable throughout studies, and thus data were not easily comparable. In 2019, only 2% of new HIV infections were attributed to injection drug use (IDU) in LA. Factors associated with HIV among PWUS included being female, IDU and homelessness, an… Show more
“…(7) Por otra parte, en relación a Latino américa se estima entre el 0,4 % y 3,9 % se obtiene conocimiento que estas cifras están en aumento. (8) Dentro de las sustancias de mayor consumo engloba el alcohol, cafeína, cannabis, alucinógenos, inhalantes, opioides, hipnóticos, sedantes, tabacos y estimulantes. (9) Además, representa un conflicto de interés a nivel económico, político, social e igualmente dentro de los factores más predisponentes para que se desencadene esta problemática son los efectos psicosociales, los mismo que engloban, desde enfermedades con alteraciones a nivel molecular y celular, accidentes o situaciones relacionadas a su entorno familiar.…”
Quality of life is defined from the economic sciences, as an effect of economic automatism and inequality in social development. In relation to people who consume psychoactive substances, it was determined that it radically affects the level and achievement of life, relationship, personal growth, physical well-being, safety, spirituality, environment, among others. Among the aims to highlight is to analyze the quality of life in drug-dependent adults, in addition, we seek to collect information about the quality of life in general and later focused on people addicted to psychoactive substances, to gather research in relation to drug dependence and to associate the QOL investigations in patients addicted to psychoactive substances. Therefore, it is established that there is a low level in the quality of life of this group of patients, due to the fact that such addiction affects several aspects, causing alterations in their behavior. In this way, the quality of life is determined by means of medical instruments that are used during clinical practice, in relation to people addicted to psychoactive substances, it is established that it has detrimental effects leading to the development of various psychiatric and behavioral disorders.
“…(7) Por otra parte, en relación a Latino américa se estima entre el 0,4 % y 3,9 % se obtiene conocimiento que estas cifras están en aumento. (8) Dentro de las sustancias de mayor consumo engloba el alcohol, cafeína, cannabis, alucinógenos, inhalantes, opioides, hipnóticos, sedantes, tabacos y estimulantes. (9) Además, representa un conflicto de interés a nivel económico, político, social e igualmente dentro de los factores más predisponentes para que se desencadene esta problemática son los efectos psicosociales, los mismo que engloban, desde enfermedades con alteraciones a nivel molecular y celular, accidentes o situaciones relacionadas a su entorno familiar.…”
Quality of life is defined from the economic sciences, as an effect of economic automatism and inequality in social development. In relation to people who consume psychoactive substances, it was determined that it radically affects the level and achievement of life, relationship, personal growth, physical well-being, safety, spirituality, environment, among others. Among the aims to highlight is to analyze the quality of life in drug-dependent adults, in addition, we seek to collect information about the quality of life in general and later focused on people addicted to psychoactive substances, to gather research in relation to drug dependence and to associate the QOL investigations in patients addicted to psychoactive substances. Therefore, it is established that there is a low level in the quality of life of this group of patients, due to the fact that such addiction affects several aspects, causing alterations in their behavior. In this way, the quality of life is determined by means of medical instruments that are used during clinical practice, in relation to people addicted to psychoactive substances, it is established that it has detrimental effects leading to the development of various psychiatric and behavioral disorders.
“…Substance use remains a robust predictor of HIV infection across resource-diverse contexts and settings (Allen, Myers, & Ray, 2015; Huff et al, 2022; Rumbwere Dube, Marshall, Ryan, & Omonijo, 2018; Shuper et al, 2010). Specifically, a recent systematic review found that injecting drugs, smoking crack-cocaine, and binge-drinking (as well as similar behaviors by one’s partner) predicted HIV infection among adults in high-income countries (Rumbwere Dube et al, 2018), while separate reviews similarly reported that injecting drugs and using stimulants (such as methamphetamines) contributed to HIV burden in lower-resource environments (El-Bassel, Shaw, Dasgupta, & Strathdee, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a recent systematic review found that injecting drugs, smoking crack-cocaine, and binge-drinking (as well as similar behaviors by one’s partner) predicted HIV infection among adults in high-income countries (Rumbwere Dube et al, 2018), while separate reviews similarly reported that injecting drugs and using stimulants (such as methamphetamines) contributed to HIV burden in lower-resource environments (El-Bassel, Shaw, Dasgupta, & Strathdee, 2014). Pathways linking substance use to HIV infection include direct routes, such as needle sharing among people who inject drugs, and indirect routes, through behavioral disinhibition (e.g., through heavy alcohol use or stimulant use) in the form of condomless sex (El-Bassel et al, 2014; Heath, Lanoye, & Maisto, 2012; Huff et al, 2022; Rehm, Probst, Shield, & Shuper, 2017; Sandfort et al, 2017; Vosburgh, Mansergh, Sullivan, & Purcell, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among people living with HIV (PLHIV), substance use has also been shown to impede progress at multiple stages of the HIV care continuum, from late HIV diagnosis to treatment failure (Huff et al, 2022), accelerating HIV disease progression (Carrico, 2011). For example, engaging in heavy alcohol use – harmful or hazardous alcohol use, binge-drinking, or levels of drinking that are consistent with those seen in alcohol use disorders – has been shown to hamper uptake/initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), decrease ART adherence and CD4 cell count, increase viral load, and overall accelerate HIV disease symptom onset (Azar, Springer, Meyer, & Altice, 2010; Molina, Simon, Amedee, Welsh, & Ferguson, 2018; Rehm et al, 2017; Shuper et al, 2010).…”
Substance use remains a robust predictor of HIV infection, as well as a serious impediment to progress across the HIV care continuum for people living with HIV. As such, the careful design and implementation of interventions uniquely tailored to target substance use and HIV care behaviors remain paramount. A necessary step in these efforts is to understand the extent to which HIV care interventions have been efficacious in helping people who use substances progress across the HIV care continuum. Using PubMed and ProQuest databases, we performed a systematic review of randomized trials of HIV care continuum interventions among people who use substances published between 2011 and 2021, the treatment-as-prevention era. Existing systematic reviews and studies in which less than half of those sampled reported substance use were excluded. We identified ten studies (total N=5410; range: 210-1308), nine of which intentionally targeted substance-using populations. Four of these studies involved use of at least one of several substances, including alcohol, opioids, stimulants, and/or marijuana, among others; three involved injection drug use only; one involved methamphetamine use only; and one involved alcohol use only. One study targeted a population with incidental substance use, which involved use of alcohol, injection drug use, and non-injection drug use. Viral suppression was targeted in 8/10 studies, followed by uptake/initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART; 6/10), ART adherence (6/10), retention to care (4/10), and linkage to care (3/10). For each outcome, intervention effects were found in roughly half of the studies in which a given outcome was assessed. Mediated (2/10) and moderated (2/10) effects were minimally examined. The diversity of substances used in and across studies, as well as other characteristics that varied across studies, prevented broad deductions or conclusions about the amenability of specific substances to intervention. Moreover, study quality was mixed due to varying attrition and assessment measures (self-report vs biological/clinical). More coordinated, comprehensive, and targeted efforts are needed to disentangle intervention effects on HIV care continuum outcomes among populations using diverse substances.
“…It is estimated that 1 in 8 substance users lives with HIV, and that this number is 1.4 million people worldwide. HIV infection is 22 times more common in those with intravenous substance use compared to the general population (4). National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) considers drug addiction and HIV to be intertwined epidemics, and emphasizes the close connection between substance addiction and hepatitis (NIDA, 2013) (1).…”
Aim
Substance abuse and concomitant infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. Yet, the number of epidemiological studies regarding infectious diseases in people with substance abuse are limited in our country. In this study, the aim was to investigate the frequency of illegal alcohol and substance use in an Alcohol and Drug Research, Treatment and Training Centres (AMATEM) clinic in Turkey as well as the HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV parameters between the years of 2016-2021.
Material and Method
HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV tests were conducted using the ELISA technique in 6881 alcohol and substance use disorder (ASUD). Urine samples from ASUD’s were analyzed for alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine metabolites. The results were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
All of the 6881 ASUD’s were male with a mean age of 32.18±9.66 years. Of the 6881 ASUD’s included in the study, 4107 (59.7%) were opioid addicts; 1479 (21.5%) were mixed drug addicts; 897 (13%) were alcohol addicts; and the rest were addicts with other types of substance use. The mean age of the alcohol users was 45.33±13.03 and the mean age of opioid users was 29.90±7.13. The percentage of opioid addiction in 2016 was 71.2% which dropped to 28.7% in 2021. Meanwhile, the percentage of alcohol addiction was 13.6% in 2016 and increased to 21.4% in 2021; and the percentage of mixed drug use was 8.7% in 2016 and increased to 36.8% in 2021. HBsAg-positivity in opioid users (56.7%) was higher compared to cannabis users (2.6%) and mixed drug users (22.3%). Anti-HCV positivity of opioid users (69.4%) was found to be higher compared to alcohol (9.4%), cannabis (2%), and mixed drug (16.2%) users, and this finding was statistically significant (p=0.0001). Anti-HBs positivity of opioid users (63.1%) was found to be higher compared to alcohol (9.9%), cannabis (3%), and mixed drug (21%) users, and this finding was statistically significant (p=0.0001). Anti-HIV was determined negative in all ASUD’s. The highest rates of HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HBs positivity were found in the 26-30 years of age.
Conclusion
These findings indicate a high prevalence of intravenous substance abuse in the 26-30 years age group in our region as well as the high HBV and HCV rates in this patient group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.