1996
DOI: 10.1142/s0129167x9600013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hitchin Systems and Kp Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar tasks have been carried out in the literature (see [2,13,14,17]) where the set of points of Gr(V ) defined by certain geometric data has been characterized.…”
Section: Algebro-geometric Points Of Gr(v )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar tasks have been carried out in the literature (see [2,13,14,17]) where the set of points of Gr(V ) defined by certain geometric data has been characterized.…”
Section: Algebro-geometric Points Of Gr(v )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out by Li and Mulase [14] that a Zariski open subset of the moduli space of Higgs pairs over a curve can be embedded into a quotient Grassmannian and that the restriction of the n-component KP-flow is precisely the Hamiltonian flow of the Hitchin system.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [80] on the language of category theory the part of the paper of Krichever and Novikov [66] where the KP hierarchy was realised as deformations of framed semi-stable vector bundles of rank l ≥ 1 with c 1 = lg over non-singular Riemann surfaces of genus g is exposed. Theta functional identities and formulae are not discussed in [80,70,71]. It seems interesting to relate with theta functional formulae the results of [70] where the Prym varieties of n-sheeted coverings were ineffectively characterised in terms of the n-component KP hierarchies.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3 is devoted to the study of the Krichever map for the moduli space of Higgs pairs with extra formal data, Higgs ∞ X . For this goal, an alternative method to that of [7] and [4] is proposed: the use of a fibration of infinite Sato Grassmannians (over a formal analogue A of the Hitchin base) and a generalization of the Krichever morphism. We show that the Krichever map is injective (Theorem 3.2) and a characterization of its image is also given (Theorem 3.3), allowing us to state the first main result: Higgs ∞ X is a closed subscheme of U ∞ X × A (Theorem 3.4, where U ∞ X is the moduli scheme of vector bundles over X with formal extra data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%