CLIL in Foreign Language Education: E-Textbook for Foreign Language Teachers 2015
DOI: 10.17846/clil.2015.7-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of CLIL (2015)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content language integrated learning (CLIL) is a methodology when a foreign language functions as a means of communication rather than the aim of teaching, and language learning becomes meaningful and leads toward better long-term retention. It is based on dual aims (content / subject discipline aims and language teaching aims), and its main principles are often presented by the abbreviation 4Cs 1 -content, communication, cognition and culture, or extended 5C, which includes the development of competence 2 . The competence in this context means that teachers should consider "can-do" statements 3 they want their students to be able to do by the end of the lesson.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Content language integrated learning (CLIL) is a methodology when a foreign language functions as a means of communication rather than the aim of teaching, and language learning becomes meaningful and leads toward better long-term retention. It is based on dual aims (content / subject discipline aims and language teaching aims), and its main principles are often presented by the abbreviation 4Cs 1 -content, communication, cognition and culture, or extended 5C, which includes the development of competence 2 . The competence in this context means that teachers should consider "can-do" statements 3 they want their students to be able to do by the end of the lesson.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework 4C+1 was suggested by Lynch [1] addressing also the theory presented by Coyle, Hood and Marsh 4 . The term CLIL came into existence in 1994 [2]; however, it has a much longer history and the signs of the CLIL principles have been present in different approaches; e. g. integrated thematic instruction (school model designed by Susan Kovalik 5 ), immersion [3], content-based instruction [4], task-based language teaching [5], English for specific purpose [6][7][8][9][10] or bilingual education (see, e.g. [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990s, CLIL was promptly accepted by many European countries and first launched in Finland (Hanesová, 2015). Its adaptation brought the necessity to combine financial and institutional support and specific teacher training (Banegas, 2012;Nikula et al, 2016;Wolff, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the approaches that have systematically been at forefront of language teaching research and that have consistently drawn the attention of both practitioners and policy-makers are Content and Language-Integrated Learning (CLIL) and Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT). Both CLIL and TBLT emerged in the 1980s (Ahmadian, 2016;Bygate, 2016;Hanesová, 2015) in the light of the principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Far from having become outdated, their theoretical tenets and methodological solutions have proven to be of great value in terms of finding ways to meet the current needs of contemporary society, in particular as far as the latest technological developments and skill requirements are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%