2018
DOI: 10.1785/0220180064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Seismicity of the Rijeka Region (Northwest External Dinarides, Croatia)—Part II: The Klana Earthquakes of 1870

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collected data (see above) permitted assigning intensity to 145 localities. Macroseismic field of the mainshock was modeled using the MEEP v.2.0 algorithm [37] modified as described in detail by [38,39]. Figure 6 presents Intensity Data Points (IDPs) in the epicentral area.…”
Section: Inversion Of the Macroseismic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected data (see above) permitted assigning intensity to 145 localities. Macroseismic field of the mainshock was modeled using the MEEP v.2.0 algorithm [37] modified as described in detail by [38,39]. Figure 6 presents Intensity Data Points (IDPs) in the epicentral area.…”
Section: Inversion Of the Macroseismic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of earthquake triggered landslides in Croatia is relatively low, according to the seismicity of some parts of Croatia including the wider area of the City of Rijeka, earthquakes could be a landslide triggering factors in the future. A list of most important historical earthquakes in the Rijeka Region (Herak et al 2017(Herak et al , 2018 is listed in Tab. 1.…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 List of the most significant historical earthquakes in the Rijeka Region (modified according to Herak et al 2017Herak et al , 2018. The intensity and damage are described according to Medvedev-Sponheuer-Karnikov (MSK) scale.…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The karst hydrogeological system and its vulnerable groundwater resources effectively prevent any type of CO 2 geological storage there. The other reason is generally moderate to locally strong seismic activity [1,2], which would put both the surface installations and subsurface storage objects at risk. Thus, in prospecting for geological conditions favourable for a safe and prospective CO 2 geological storage in Croatia, one is directed both to the south-western part of the Pannonian basin and to the Adriatic offshore, the latter being far less explored but still covered by a comprehensive geological dataset, adequate for screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%