2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
186
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
4
186
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Two housekeeping genes, gyrB and rpoD, are frequently utilized as molecular markers to elaborate phylogenetic relationships within the genus Pseudomonas [48,[51][52][53]. Sequences of the POXN01 gyrB and rpoD genes were recovered from the obtained contigs of POXN01 genomic DNA and individually aligned with the homologous genes from type strains of 105 species belonging to genus Pseudomonas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two housekeeping genes, gyrB and rpoD, are frequently utilized as molecular markers to elaborate phylogenetic relationships within the genus Pseudomonas [48,[51][52][53]. Sequences of the POXN01 gyrB and rpoD genes were recovered from the obtained contigs of POXN01 genomic DNA and individually aligned with the homologous genes from type strains of 105 species belonging to genus Pseudomonas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent investigation of the WS phenotype identified partially-acetylated cellulose as the main matrix component of the biofilm. The pseudomonads are a highly diverse genus (see recent reviews by [13][14]), and biofilm-formation and celluloseexpression are now known to be common amongst the water, soil, plant-associated and Adapted from [2][3]. *, Also known as the acetic acid bacteria; † , Referred to here as the enteric bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively little is known about the breakdown of the pesticide paraoxon in the environment or the microbial species responsible for its degradation. The most common molecular technique used to identify microorganisms is 16S rRNA sequencing [26][27][28][29]. However, species of larger genera, notably Pseudomonas, have proven difficult to fully resolve through this method alone [26][27][28]30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common molecular technique used to identify microorganisms is 16S rRNA sequencing [26][27][28][29]. However, species of larger genera, notably Pseudomonas, have proven difficult to fully resolve through this method alone [26][27][28]30]. Secondary approaches to microbial population identification have included biochemical or physiological criteria that are then used to generate profiles that can be stored in databases for future reference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%