2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research of energy and related fields, scholars used the entropy weight method to optimize the design of the hybrid energy system [24], comprehensively evaluate power grid planning [25], evaluate park energy utilization [26], a comprehensive risk assessment of electricity [27], calculation of petroleum standard indicators [28], and in a diesel engine emission evaluation [29]. In traffic and transportation, scholars have used the entropy weight method to evaluate the transportation of dangerous goods [30], and analyze road traffic conditions [31]. In other practical application fields, scholars also used the entropy weight method to determine weight coefficients in ionospheric combination prediction [32], construction project management evaluation [33], decision support for heavy machine re-manufacturing [34], and so on.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research of energy and related fields, scholars used the entropy weight method to optimize the design of the hybrid energy system [24], comprehensively evaluate power grid planning [25], evaluate park energy utilization [26], a comprehensive risk assessment of electricity [27], calculation of petroleum standard indicators [28], and in a diesel engine emission evaluation [29]. In traffic and transportation, scholars have used the entropy weight method to evaluate the transportation of dangerous goods [30], and analyze road traffic conditions [31]. In other practical application fields, scholars also used the entropy weight method to determine weight coefficients in ionospheric combination prediction [32], construction project management evaluation [33], decision support for heavy machine re-manufacturing [34], and so on.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-objective mathematical model is used for selection of dangerous goods transportation (Samanlıoğlu, 2013;Pamučar et al 2016;Jassbi & Makvandi, 2010). Also, many studies are available on dangerous materials transportation such as designing the terminal layout for safety (Santarremigia et al, 2018;Hervás-Peralta, 2020), evaluating safety systems in airfreight operations (Huang et al, 2020), risk assessment (Huang et al, 2021;Kanj et al, 2019;Galieriková et al, 2018;Gul et al, 2019;Raemdonck et al, 2013), evaluation of the work of advisors in the transport of hazardous goods (Pamucar et al, 2019;Milosevic et al, 2021). A limited study is carried on the selection of freight trailers (Görçün, 2019a;Görçün, 2019b) but they are not related to tanker selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bui et al [ 16 ] evaluated 273 keywords and 22 indicators obtained based on the experts’ advice by entropy weight method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory in supply chains. Huang et al [ 17 ] used two historical data-driven weight calculation approaches including Entropy Weight Method (EWM) and Scatter Degree Method (SDM) to solve the risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system (RDGTS). Li et al [ 18 ] applied principal component analysis (PCA), entropy method and random forest to calculate weighted coefficients of key metrics when assessing the ecological health of large rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [ 18 ] applied principal component analysis (PCA), entropy method and random forest to calculate weighted coefficients of key metrics when assessing the ecological health of large rivers. But references [ 16 , 17 , 18 ] just used the traditional entropy method and didn’t improve the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%