1986
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511621864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical Anthropology of the Family

Abstract: This historical anthropology of the family represents a new departure in family studies. Over the past ten years or so, the social scientific sociological analysis of the family has undergone a change, and has been obliged to reconsider its traditional view that industrialisation triggered a shift within society from the 'large family', which fulfilled all social functions from socialising the children to caring for the sick and the old, to the modern nuclear family, which was regarded solely as being the locu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
11

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Geographic proximity appears to be the critical dimension which differentiates "individualist" cultures from "collectivist" cultures because the greater economic opportunities of more affluent individualist cultures permit the establishment of nuclear families of the younger married parents in another community and also permits the acquisition of a home that is separate from the grandparental home. However, this does not necessarily imply that kinship ties are also severed (Segalen, 1986;Uzoka, 1979).…”
Section: Residence Patterns and The Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geographic proximity appears to be the critical dimension which differentiates "individualist" cultures from "collectivist" cultures because the greater economic opportunities of more affluent individualist cultures permit the establishment of nuclear families of the younger married parents in another community and also permits the acquisition of a home that is separate from the grandparental home. However, this does not necessarily imply that kinship ties are also severed (Segalen, 1986;Uzoka, 1979).…”
Section: Residence Patterns and The Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Segalen (1986Segalen ( , 1996 and others have pointed out, the employment of the term "nuclear" family has been accompanied by Parson's (1943) The structural aspects of the family -nuclear and extended-were defined in this study as follows. Nuclear family referred to mother, father and their children.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For Western Europe alone, some major works are Duby 1978;Goody 1983;Segalen 1986;Stone 1977; for anthropology one might note Levi-Strauss 1969;Murdock 1949;Whyte 1978. ) These would reveal that the degree of children's contribution to mate choice varies from null (prenatal and infant betrothal!)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, "history and anthropology are in fact closely related" (Brettell, 2002, p. S46) and many relevant works cross across these two disciplines (e.g. Goody, 1996;Jones, 2006;Kuper, 2009;McDonough, 1986;Segalen, 1986;Watson, 1985). Of course, the business disciplines are also needed, because the family business field lies at the margins of kinship and business.…”
Section: Cross-disciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%