2000
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histomorphometric Evaluation of Titanium Implants in Osteoporotic Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with several other studies [30][31][32] and suggests that osseointegration of implants may be compromised in patients with primary osteopenia, osteoporosis or secondary osteoporosis, for instance due to rheumatoid arthritis or prolonged corticosteroid treatment. There were no statistical effects of OVX on the osseointegration of titanium-only implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is consistent with several other studies [30][31][32] and suggests that osseointegration of implants may be compromised in patients with primary osteopenia, osteoporosis or secondary osteoporosis, for instance due to rheumatoid arthritis or prolonged corticosteroid treatment. There were no statistical effects of OVX on the osseointegration of titanium-only implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The authors noted poor interaction between the material implanted and bone tissue, as well as a low amount of newly formed bone, and attributed the findings to the osteoporosis-like conditions as a result of gonadal deficiency induced by ovariectomy (Hayashi et al, 1994;Lugero et al, 2000). Similar results have been reported by De Benedittis et al, (1999);Fini et al, (1997); Hayashi et al, (1994);Jung et al, (2001);and Pan et al, (2000), who used hydroxyapatite as implant material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The histological findings presented a poor interaction between the inserted material and bone tissue, and a low amount of newly formed bone, and were attributed to the osteoporosis-like conditions as a result of gonadal deficiency induced by ovariectomization procedure (Li et al, 2004;Lugero et al, 2000;Pan et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2005). Similar findings have also been reported by De Benedittis et al (1999), Fini et al (1997), Hayashi et al (1994);Jung et al (2001), who, however, used hydroxyapatite as implant material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estrogen deficiency is not a contraindication for the use of dental implants, requiring a longer waiting period for osseointegration. The same applies for grafts, since the osteopenic condition probably inhibits new bone formation 3,6,9 . In the present study, considering the bone formed around the grafts in the medullary region, the only difference between oophorectomized and non-oophorectomized animals was that the quantity of bone was lower in the first group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%