2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histomorphometric age estimation from the femoral cortex: A test of three methods in an Australian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cr was discovered. Tests of their age‐estimation formulae on modern populations attributed a high standard error of estimate to the circularity index sensitivity (Lagacé, Verna, Adalian, Baccino, & Martrille, 2019; Maggio & Franklin, 2019). Osteon inverse aspect ratio (minor axis/major axis) has been proposed as a more robust metric of osteon elongation (Hennig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Traditional Two‐dimensional Histological Age‐estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cr was discovered. Tests of their age‐estimation formulae on modern populations attributed a high standard error of estimate to the circularity index sensitivity (Lagacé, Verna, Adalian, Baccino, & Martrille, 2019; Maggio & Franklin, 2019). Osteon inverse aspect ratio (minor axis/major axis) has been proposed as a more robust metric of osteon elongation (Hennig et al, 2015).…”
Section: Traditional Two‐dimensional Histological Age‐estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone histological research within forensic anthropology has traditionally focused on analytical outcomes including the ability to accurately estimate age‐at‐death (Ahlqvist & Damsten, 1969; Bouvier & Ubelaker, 1977; Cho et al, 2002; Crowder, 2005; Ericksen, 1991; Kerley, 1965; Narasaki & Laughlin, 1990; Pfeiffer, 1992; Singh & Gunberg, 1970; Stout, 1986; Stout & Gehlert, 1982; Stout & Paine, 1992; Thompson, 1979), or differentiate human from nonhuman bone (Dominguez & Crowder, 2012; Hillier & Bell, 2007; Mulhern & Ubelaker, 2001; Mulhern & Ubelaker, 2003; Mulhern & Ubelaker, 2012). More recent research has focused on method improvement with an emphasis on validation (Crowder, 2005; Lagace, Verna, Adalian, Baccino, & Martrille, 2019; Maggio & Franklin, 2019; Milenkovic, Djukic, Djonic, Milovanovic, & Djuric, 2013), increasing accuracy and precision of current histological techniques (Heinrich, Crowder, & Pinto, 2012; Morris & Crowder, 2005), and the error generated in applying such methods (Christensen & Crowder, 2009; Christensen, Crowder, Ousley, & Houck, 2014). While these continue to remain important goals of bone histology research, efforts over the past decade have directed greater attention to linking bone histomorphometry to bone quality, fracture risk, mechanical loading history, and exploiting innovative technological modalities to explore bone microarchitecture in novel ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually all that can be seen in bone cross-sections are fragmentary and complete osteons. This continual remodelling forms the basis of efforts to assess the age of adults from counts of complete and partial osteons, and to a lesser extent changes in osteon size [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The considerable variation that exists among individuals and observer error in the counting process, however, introduce great uncertainty about age estimates based on what can be seen in cortical bone cross-sections.…”
Section: Bone Microstructure Composition and Life Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to decreased accuracy when these formulae are applied to individuals in a population who are younger than the minimum age represented in the original reference sample. 31 The main reasons for the lack of larger Figure 3. Forest plot of the effect size estimate (Hedges' g) and 95% CI for each study and the fixed-effect model in the effect-size analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%