2020
DOI: 10.1177/0025802420945939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral histomorphometric age-at-death studies: The issue of sample size and standard error

Abstract: Extant histomorphometric aging methods based on the analysis of the femoral cortex generally report small samples ( N<100) and highly variable standard error of the estimate (SEE) values (±1.51‒16.98 years). The present paper reviews the published literature on femoral histomorphometry for age-at-death estimation in order to examine the relationship between sample size and SEE values, and makes recommendations for minimum reporting requirements for age-at-death studies based on statistical data. The SEE fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a representative value per litter type, a representative sample size is needed. Many scientific disciplines notice the relation between sample size and some sort of measurement of error (e.g., Lamé and Defize, 1993;Cardini and Elton, 2007;Hennig and Cooper, 2011;Maggio and Franklin, 2020) and sample size determination is considered an important step in protocol design (Lenth, 2001). Where undersized studies produce useless results, oversized studies use more resources than necessary (Lenth, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a representative value per litter type, a representative sample size is needed. Many scientific disciplines notice the relation between sample size and some sort of measurement of error (e.g., Lamé and Defize, 1993;Cardini and Elton, 2007;Hennig and Cooper, 2011;Maggio and Franklin, 2020) and sample size determination is considered an important step in protocol design (Lenth, 2001). Where undersized studies produce useless results, oversized studies use more resources than necessary (Lenth, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%