2016
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological validation of cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping for detecting diffuse myocardial fibrosis in diabetic rabbits

Abstract: ECV has a very strong correlation with pathological CVF, and can be used to assess the degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis better than the postcontrast T value. Precontrast T value has no significant correlation with diffuse myocardial fibrosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1179-1185.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed that the ECV value was strongly correlated with CVF, and the postcontrast T1 value was moderately associated with the CVF value. The main reason is likely that the gadolinium agent (as an extracellular contrast agent) could not pass through the cell membrane and enter the cell; therefore, the postcontrast T1 value was mainly associated with the contrast agent concentration in the extracellular matrix, which is consistent with the ndings of our previous studies [23,29] and another study [28] . In addition, our study showed that the ECV value was higher than CVF, possibly because the CVF value re ects only the extracellular collagen ber content, whereas the ECV value can also indicate mucus matrix, lipid, and necrosis components outside cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study showed that the ECV value was strongly correlated with CVF, and the postcontrast T1 value was moderately associated with the CVF value. The main reason is likely that the gadolinium agent (as an extracellular contrast agent) could not pass through the cell membrane and enter the cell; therefore, the postcontrast T1 value was mainly associated with the contrast agent concentration in the extracellular matrix, which is consistent with the ndings of our previous studies [23,29] and another study [28] . In addition, our study showed that the ECV value was higher than CVF, possibly because the CVF value re ects only the extracellular collagen ber content, whereas the ECV value can also indicate mucus matrix, lipid, and necrosis components outside cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our experimental study, no LGE regions were observed in the myocardium in the T1DM group. Meanwhile, Zhang [28] and Zeng [29] have reported the same result. Some studies have indicated the presence of LGE regions in some patients with DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The ECV measurements in this study had not previously been validated in a monkey model. Given the close agreement of ECV among various species [39, 40], it is reasonable to assume that the ECV measurement in a monkey is still valid, although direct rigorous validation remains to be performed by histopathology. While we did monitor blood pressures immediately before and after CMR study, we did not have pressure data during the CMR study to normalize CMR results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMR T1 mapping was recently shown to possibly be capable of overcoming this weakness through quantification of the T1 value and extracellular volume (ECV) within the myocardium as an imaging marker to assess the myocardial interstitial matrix [ 9 ]. Previous studies in diabetic patients and animals have indicated the presence of diffuse myocardial fibrosis based on histological evidence [ 10 , 11 ]. Some studies also revealed that diabetic patients had lower post-contrast myocardial T1 values and greater ECVs, suggestive of extracellular interstitial expansion compared with healthy subjects, although the left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were normal [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%