2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic findings associated with false-positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging performed for prostate cancer detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, benign tissue could also be representative of the true state of the IT. This situation was recently shown to correlate with a higher density of connective tissue, basal cell hyperplasia, and inflammation than observed in concurrent systematic biopsies [25]. In the present series, it was observed in 18 patients, of whom 12 showed active or chronic inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, benign tissue could also be representative of the true state of the IT. This situation was recently shown to correlate with a higher density of connective tissue, basal cell hyperplasia, and inflammation than observed in concurrent systematic biopsies [25]. In the present series, it was observed in 18 patients, of whom 12 showed active or chronic inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[6] However, mpMRI is not disease specific, and many benign conditions such as acute and chronic prostatitis, basal cell hyperplasia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or postbiopsy changes can give false-positive results and thus may result in an unnecessary biopsy. [78] Besides these, the field of evaluation is usually limited to the pelvis, and separate imaging is usually required to image for distant metastasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show 61% suspicious ventral lesions in men with negative F-Bx but later PCa diagnosis. Moreover, as stated by the authors, those regions could be misinterpreted by radiologists [24]. The success of a F-Bx is directly correlated to the radiologist’s experience and skill for identifying suspicious lesions in mpMRI and minimizing false-positive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%