2011
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic Evaluation of the Buccal and Lingual Bone Plates in Anterior Dog Teeth: Possible Influence on Implant Dentistry

Abstract: It is reasonable to conclude that the higher bone density, represented by the lower number of marrow spaces, in association with the thinner aspect of the buccal bone plates made them more fragile to absorb compared to the lingual bone plates, especially during mucoperiosteal procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon might be associated with the relatively thin and mainly compact buccal plate compared to usually thicker and more cancellous lingual bone adjacent to dental implants (Novaes et al. ). Consequently, lingual sites may respond to the insult of PI with infra‐bony defect formation, whereas bone loss on the buccal aspect might be mostly supra‐crestal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon might be associated with the relatively thin and mainly compact buccal plate compared to usually thicker and more cancellous lingual bone adjacent to dental implants (Novaes et al. ). Consequently, lingual sites may respond to the insult of PI with infra‐bony defect formation, whereas bone loss on the buccal aspect might be mostly supra‐crestal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also previously found that density of the buccal bone tissue is higher than that of the lingual bone tissue (Novaes, et al 2011). On the other hand, the values of E and H obtained by nanoindentation have been found to correlate significantly with the degree of bone mineral density (Mulder, Koolstra, den Toonder & van Eijden 2008, Mulder, Koolstra, den Toonder & van Eijden 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…, Novaes et al. ). It has been suggested that the immediate placement of an implant in the fresh extraction socket could reduce alveolar ridge resorption following tooth removal (Denissen et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%