1878
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.103654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histoire des drogues d'origine vegetale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1900
1900
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we analysed four collection samples from "false angostura", which is a falsification of angostura bark (Galipea officinalis). In the literature, from the 19 th and early 20 th century, the false angostura was generally described as "bark from S. nux-vomica imported from India", without more precision, the real origin of the samples remaining quite confused (Felter & Lloyd, 1898;Flückiger and Hanbury, 1878;Grieve, 1971;Tschirch, 1923). According to our PCA results, the false angostura bark should be classified as an S. nux-vomica root bark sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we analysed four collection samples from "false angostura", which is a falsification of angostura bark (Galipea officinalis). In the literature, from the 19 th and early 20 th century, the false angostura was generally described as "bark from S. nux-vomica imported from India", without more precision, the real origin of the samples remaining quite confused (Felter & Lloyd, 1898;Flückiger and Hanbury, 1878;Grieve, 1971;Tschirch, 1923). According to our PCA results, the false angostura bark should be classified as an S. nux-vomica root bark sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proved to be a most dangerous adulteration, causing several deaths between 1804 and 1806 in Germany, Switzerland and Hungary. As a result, true angostura fell into disfavour, (the nux-vomica being called false angostura) (Flückiger and Hanbury, 1878;Grieve, 1971;Tschirch, 1923). We have analysed here four different samples of false angostura bark, to check if they were classified amongst S. nux-vomica samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eluterin K (2 1. 1 H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.19 (s, H-15), 7.13 (s, H-16), 6.26 (s, H-14), 5.37 (m, H-7), 4.23 (d, J ) 11.0 Hz, H-20a), 4.15 (d, J ) 11.0 Hz, H-20b), 3.21 (dd, J ) 6.0, 2.9 Hz, H-3), 2.64 (dt, J ) 12.5, 3.7 Hz, H-12a), 2.36 (dt, J ) 12.5, 5.1 Hz, H-12b), 2.28 (m, H-8), 2.17 (overlapped, H-6a), 2.15 (overlapped, H-6b), 1.97 (dt, J ) 12.5, 5.1 Hz, H-11a), 1.94 (m, H-1a), 1.80 (dt, J ) 12.5, 3.7 Hz, Pharmacological Tests. Gastric acid secretion was measured in the isolated, lumen-perfused, stomach preparation of the mouse as previously described (11).…”
Section: General Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bitter bark of the South American tree Croton eluteria Bennett (Euphorbiaceae), commonly known as cascarilla, has been widely used in traditional folk medicine as a replacement for Cinchona and Cascara, and to treat various diseases (1). Today, its major use is in the realm of aromatization, where its fragrance and bitter taste make it a popular ingredient of liqueurs (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation