2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histamine responses of large neostriatal interneurons in histamine H1 and H2 receptor knock-out mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is postulated that leptin may exert at least part of its influence through a pathway linked to H1-receptor, reducing food intake [44]. In fact leptin-induced food intake appears suppressed in H1 knockout mice [45, 46]. This data suggests that hypothalamic histamine is a modulator of leptin activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is postulated that leptin may exert at least part of its influence through a pathway linked to H1-receptor, reducing food intake [44]. In fact leptin-induced food intake appears suppressed in H1 knockout mice [45, 46]. This data suggests that hypothalamic histamine is a modulator of leptin activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify this hypothesis, pharmacological experiments using receptor-gene knockout mice should be conducted. Previous studies have shown that histaminergic neurons have inhibitory effects on behavioral sensitization and rewarding using histamine H 1 /H 2 receptor-gene doubleknockout mice (10,11), histidine decarboxylase-gene knockout mice (12), and brain-lesion methods in rats (13). However, further studies are needed to clearly determine whether the histaminergic neuron system has inhibitory effects on behavioral sensitization and rewarding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Hdc −/− mice showed stronger methamphetamine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity than wild-type controls (Kubota et al, 2002;Iwabuchi et al, 2004;Acevedo and Raber, 2011). This may be due to a lack of H 1 R-and H 2 R stimulation, because increased sensitivity to methamphetamine was also reported for H 1 R/H 2 R double knockouts (Iwabuchi et al, 2004;Ogawa et al, 2009). Moreover, metamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was stronger in Hrh1 −/− mice than in wild-type controls .…”
Section: Dopaminergic Reward System and Other Neurotransmitter Systemsmentioning
confidence: 86%