1977
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.40.6.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histamine receptors in the coronary circulation of the dog. Effects of mepyramine and metiamide on responses to histamine infusions.

Abstract: SUMMARY The effect of histamine on coronary blood flow (CBF) was studied in anaesthetized greyhounds. CBF and systemic blood pressure were measured using electromagnetic flow transducers and catheters in the aorta during infusions of drugs into the left circumflex coronary artery. Histamine infusions (5, 10, and 20 figjmin) produced dose-related increases in CBF without changing heart rate or blood pressure. Metiamide (100 /ig/min) given simultaneously produced a parallel displacement of the histamine dose-res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would seem to indicate some type of interaction between H1-and H2-receptors to produce dilatation that can only be inhibited by a combination of H1-and H2-receptor antagonists. Such an effect has also been reported in dog coronary arteries in vivo (Giles et al, 1977) and in guinea-pig isolated hearts by some (Reinhardt, Wiemann & Schumann, 1976) but not all observers (Ecran, Bokesoy & Turker, 1974;Levi & Kuye, 1974;Broadley, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This would seem to indicate some type of interaction between H1-and H2-receptors to produce dilatation that can only be inhibited by a combination of H1-and H2-receptor antagonists. Such an effect has also been reported in dog coronary arteries in vivo (Giles et al, 1977) and in guinea-pig isolated hearts by some (Reinhardt, Wiemann & Schumann, 1976) but not all observers (Ecran, Bokesoy & Turker, 1974;Levi & Kuye, 1974;Broadley, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In beating guinea-pig (Broadley, 1975) and dog (Giles et al, 1977) heart, histamine produces a vasodilation, whereas it produces vasoconstriction in isolated canine coronary arteries (Smith et al, 1951;Carrier, 1965). The results of this study shed little light on such divergent data except that the differences may be dependent upon the type of or concentration of histamine receptors, or a histamine-mediated release of vasodilating substances in the beating heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The hyperpolarization induced by histamine may be due to an increased K + conductance that is mediated by an increased Ca 2+ influx, since inhibition of Ca THE effects of histamine on vascular smooth muscle (VSM) are highly variable and range from excitation to inhibition to no effect (Broadley, 1975;Carrier, 1965;Reite, 1972;Altura and Altura, 1974;Hudgins and Weiss, 1968). When injected into the beating dog heart, histamine causes a marked in-crease in coronary blood flow (Giles et al, 1977) suggesting a vasodilation. However, when added to the bathing solution of isolated coronary arteries of dog (Carrier, 1965), swine, and man (Smith et al, 1951), histamine causes a vasoconstriction.…”
Section: Membrane Electrical Effects Of Histamine Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the known dependence of changes in contractility on changes in rate [20], interpretation of the above results is not unequivocal. The use of intact anesthetized dogs to determine the inotropic effects of histamine by measuring changes in left ventricular dP/dt has yielded conflicting results ranging from negative [12,13] to positive [11,13] responses, including a lack of effect [14]. In addition to the confounding influence of chronotropic changes already alluded to, the results obtained in this type of preparation were undoubtedly affected by extracardiac actions of histamine, notably hypotension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a dose of the amine eliciting marked peripheral dilator and constrictor responses had minimal influence on cardiac function [6,7]. In this species, either positive [8][9][10][11], negative [12,13], or lack of [14] inotropic effects have been reported. Such conflicting results are apparently due to the varying degrees of reliability of the methods used to measure changes in cardiac contractility, as well as to the confounding influence of the reflex and general hemodynamic actions of histamine in intact preparations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%