2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

His-bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing following atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and reduced ejection fraction: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study—The ALTERNATIVE-AF trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it could represent an alternative to BiV pacing in patients with an expected high percentage of pacing with concomitant severe left ventricular dysfunction and narrow QRS (3,7). Recent randomized trials further confirmed that HBP could deliver better improvement of EF compared to BiV in patients undergoing AVNA (8). However, there are some limitations associated with HBP, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it could represent an alternative to BiV pacing in patients with an expected high percentage of pacing with concomitant severe left ventricular dysfunction and narrow QRS (3,7). Recent randomized trials further confirmed that HBP could deliver better improvement of EF compared to BiV in patients undergoing AVNA (8). However, there are some limitations associated with HBP, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary studies showed that AVJA is technically feasible in the presence of a CSP lead, portending significant improvement in QRS duration, LVEF, and better clinical outcomes (reduction of death and HF hospitalizations) compared with RVP and BVP (Vijayaraman et al, 2022d). Recently, in a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover trial, enrolling 50 patients undergoing AVJA, HBP delivered a modest but significant improvement in LVEF in patients with persistent AF, impaired left ventricular function (LVEF≤40%), and narrow QRS duration, compared with BVP (Huang et al, 2022). Noteworthy, in an observational study, AVJA in the presence of an LBBAP lead was associated with a higher success rate and fewer acute and chronic lead-related complications compared to AVJA in the presence of an HBP lead (Pillai et al, 2022).…”
Section: Pace and Ablatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies and guidelines suggest that in patients with reduced LVEF and narrow QRS complex, BVP provides limited benefit ( Moss et al, 2009 ; Tracy et al, 2012 ). Compelling results of applying CSP in patients with PICM, RV pacing upgrading as well as AV node ablation in atrial fibrillation patients are accumulating ( Vijayaraman et al, 2017 ; Cai et al, 2022 ; Huang W. et al, 2022 ; Ivanovski et al, 2022 ). Hence, we expect that CSP may be a better option for primary and upgrading therapy in HF patients who have intact intraventricular conduction but need high RV pacing burden due to bradycardia or AV node ablation.…”
Section: Conduction System Pacing: the Evidence For Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%