Hired gardens and the question of transgression: lawns, food gardens and the business of ‘alternative’ food practice

Abstract

As increased awareness of the industrial-capitalist food system draws consumers into ‘alternative’ food networks, a variety of approaches are being taken to access fresh, local foods. A growing trend within alternative food practice is the increasing number of people who are ripping out their lawns and creating sites of food production in neighborhood spaces. This challenge to the iconic lawn landscape has been viewed by some as both an alternative to the conventional marketplace and an act of transgression against neighborhood norms. This article explores a new strategy that has been used to access food, what I have termed the ‘hired garden’, to examine the contradictory implications of yard food production done for hire. Using the space of the yard as a vehicle for exploring transgression and resistance, this article considers the claim that accessing food through ‘alternative’ means is necessarily transgressive. I argue that such practices are not inherently transgressive or resistant and instead invite scholars to ask critical questions about transgression, resistance and landscapes of power. At the same time, this article suggests that the recent establishment of businesses that can be hired to install, maintain and harvest vegetables from their clients’ yards is a fundamental cultural contradiction, whereby consumers have competing desires to have easy access to fresh, local foods and to produce their own food. Finally, this analytical look at the hired garden addresses: who are the recipients of such services, and who has access to this type of food, drawing on critiques of the ‘alternative food movement,’ which characterize it as a white, middle-class phenomenon.

Transplanting, plotting, fencing: relational property practices in community gardens

“…These explorations lead to the main argument 12 that community gardening practices are partly motivated by community objectives but 13 equally relate to private gardening practices and to gardeners' personal lives. Gardeners 14 produce understandings of property relationally which leads to contradictory motivations and 15 relationships that are at once geared towards community belonging and personal interest.…”

“…Or in Blomley's 10 words (2016, page 227): 'Property is only good against the world if lay people understand the 11 nature of the rights to which it is attached'. Even when approached as an individual 12 entitlement, property is an inherently communicative and hence social phenomenon. This is 13 why Rose (1994) argues that any private property regime as a whole is common property 14 shared among its subscribers.…”

“…The focus on practices 12 in community gardens shows that these projects comprise community-mindedness as well as …”

Urban agriculture, racial capitalism, and resistance in the settler‐colonial city

“…Urban agriculture is caught up in racial-capitalist and settler logics of urban development precisely because it distinguishes "new development, rising home values, and a whiter residential population" from a neighborhood's "racially marginalized past" (Dillon, 2014(Dillon, , p. 1211, or as Pettygrove and Ghose (2018, p. 601) put it, UA works "to racialize revitalization as whiteness, in that it is a process meant to improve neighborhoods understood to be black." Urban agriculture, like other green amenities, is thus performative and often most widespread in some of the trendiest neighborhoods (Lebowitz & Trudeau, 2017;Lowell & Law, 2017;McClintock, Mahmoudi, Simpson, & Santos, 2016;Naylor, 2012;Quastel, 2009). Urban agriculture, like other green amenities, is thus performative and often most widespread in some of the trendiest neighborhoods (Lebowitz & Trudeau, 2017;Lowell & Law, 2017;McClintock, Mahmoudi, Simpson, & Santos, 2016;Naylor, 2012;Quastel, 2009).…”

The Food Movement: Growing White Privilege, Diversity, or Empowerment?

“…Like our efforts to incorporate diversity, it does give voice to the underrepresented and underserved. Ultimately, however, a successful empowerment model for food systems work opens resources, authority, and power to those who have been denied opportunities to control their own lives (Burdick, 2014;Kojolo, 2013;Naylor, 2012;Rodriguez, 2011). It provides an environment in which diverse groups create a mosaic of solutions that they share and respect, even when the solutions reflect different values, cultures, and traditions (Fagan & Stevenson, 2002;Gollub, Cyrus-Cameron, Armstrong, Boney, & Chhatre, 2013;Leerlooijer, Bos, Ruiter, van Reeuwijk, Rijsdijk, Nshakira, & Kok, 2013).…”