1998
DOI: 10.1177/019263659808259419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Successful Women Administrators: The Inside Stories of How They Got There

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality proved to be more challenging than the women anticipated when having to deal with: negativity amongst their staff; a lack of professionalism and maturity; a realization that not all of their staff liked or trusted them; negative comments, discrimination, and backstabbing. Gupton and Slick [20] urge women not to reinforce the glass ceiling by not believing in themselves, and their potential to do well in leadership positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reality proved to be more challenging than the women anticipated when having to deal with: negativity amongst their staff; a lack of professionalism and maturity; a realization that not all of their staff liked or trusted them; negative comments, discrimination, and backstabbing. Gupton and Slick [20] urge women not to reinforce the glass ceiling by not believing in themselves, and their potential to do well in leadership positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of the study, Emma seemed frustrated, stressed and worn down by her post as a principal and decided to resign after only two years. Gupton and Slick [20] urge women not to reinforce the glass ceiling by not believing in themselves, and their potential to do well in leadership positions. Candice and Emma, on the other hand, had succumbed to negative experiences in their role as principals by feeling unworthy and alone.…”
Section: Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaires were based on Broadbridge (2008), Gupton and Slick (1996) and Lyness and Thompson (2000) and largely adapted based on the findings of previous regional research in order to suite the Arab situation. The general outlines of the questionnaires and interviews were borrowed from Gupton and Slick (1996).…”
Section: Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general outlines of the questionnaires and interviews were borrowed from Gupton and Slick (1996). The questionnaires allowed for both concise, quantitative responses as well as short answer/essay responses that were qualitative in nature.…”
Section: Research Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there is a conflation in the literature between sex (biology) and gender (the social construction of normative behavior), studies of female superintendents suggest that females do not enjoy the same level of encouragement, mentorship, or sponsorship as do males, and that they continue to face gender bias and gender discrimination (Bell, 1995;Blount, 1998;Brunner, 2000bBrunner, , 2003Grogan, 1996;Kachur-Reico, 2010;Kamler & Shakeshaft, 1999;Ortiz & Marshall, 1988;Shakeshaft, 1989Shakeshaft, , 1999Skrla, Reyes & Scheurich, 2000;Tallerico, 2000). Others contend that context plays an important role in who is hired in administrative positions, as women have been documented to have gained strides in obtaining administrative positions in very small school divisions (Gupton & Slick, 1996;Wallin, 2005a;2005b), remote school divisions (Kachur-Reico, 2010), and inner-city urban divisions (Mertz, 2003;Murtadha-Watts, 2000). As well, while some researchers argue that there are significant differences in the ways in which men and women lead that may impact on the perceptions of their effectiveness (Bjork, 2000;Brunner, 2000a;Chase, 1995;Gilligan, 1982;Marshall, Patterson, Rogers & Steele, 1996;Pounder, 1990, Shakeshaft, 1989, 1999, others have argued that leadership style has little to do with gender and/or more to do with accommodations to socially constructed leadership norms (Astin & Leland, 1991;Eagly & Johnson, 1990;Eagly & Johannesen-Schmidt, 2001, Eagly, Karau & Johnston, 1992 Added to this is the common understanding that the nature of the position of superintendent has changed dramatically in the past decade (Grogan, 2000), which has implications for both men and women in the position.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%