2005
DOI: 10.1021/es050720b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Sensitive and Selective Amperometric Microbial Biosensor for Direct Determination of p-Nitrophenyl-Substituted Organophosphate Nerve Agents

Abstract: We report herein a whole cell-based amperometric biosensor for highly selective, highly sensitive, direct, single-step, rapid, and cost-effective determination of organophosphate pesticides with a p-nitrophenyl substituent. The biosensor was comprised of a p-nitrophenol degrader, Pseudomonas putida JS444, genetically engineered to express organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) on the cell surface immobilized on the carbon paste electrode. Surface-expressed OPH catalyzed hydrolysis of the p-nitrophenyl substituent or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other biosensor methods, the linear ranges obtained by this study are wider than those obtained by OPH-modified amperometric biosensor method (0 -2 mmol/L for parathion) 17 and the microbial biosensor method (0.2 -50 mmol/L for parathion). 18 The detection limits obtained by this study are lower than that obtained by the microbial biosensor method (58 ppb for parathion), 18 and higher than that obtained by OPH-modified amperometric biosensor method (0.29 ppb for parathion) 17 and AChE-modified amperometric biosensor method (10 -8 -10 -9 mol/L for chlorpyrifos). 9 However, other enzyme modified biosensors need special auxiliary reagents, and the preparation processes are also complicated.…”
Section: Typical Potential Response Curve Of the Enzymatic Reactionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with other biosensor methods, the linear ranges obtained by this study are wider than those obtained by OPH-modified amperometric biosensor method (0 -2 mmol/L for parathion) 17 and the microbial biosensor method (0.2 -50 mmol/L for parathion). 18 The detection limits obtained by this study are lower than that obtained by the microbial biosensor method (58 ppb for parathion), 18 and higher than that obtained by OPH-modified amperometric biosensor method (0.29 ppb for parathion) 17 and AChE-modified amperometric biosensor method (10 -8 -10 -9 mol/L for chlorpyrifos). 9 However, other enzyme modified biosensors need special auxiliary reagents, and the preparation processes are also complicated.…”
Section: Typical Potential Response Curve Of the Enzymatic Reactionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…6 So far, some OPs biosensors have been reported, including those based on acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition tests using AChE-modified amperometric and potentiometric transducers, [7][8][9][10] those based on hydrolytic tests with organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) using OPH-modified amperometric and potentiometric transducers, [11][12][13][14][15] those based on hydrolytic tests with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) using ALPmodified fluorescent transducer, 16 those based on oxidation current measurements using recombinant microorganisms with surface expressed OPH, 17,18 and those based on the changes in resonant frequency of a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) owing to the mass loading using QCM-enzyme sensor. 19 However, these biosensors have some disadvantages, including complicated preparations, unsteady response, poor reproducibility, and low sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, P. putida has been used for the detection of aromatic hydrocarbons and organophosphate nerve agents [24], while S. cerevisiae Y190 has been used for determining endocrine disruptor compounds [25]. In the same context, amperometric measurements have been used with E.coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Ralstonia eutropha in genotoxicity assays [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All chemical reagents and the details of the recombinant PNP-degrader Pseudomonas putida JS444 anchoring and displaying OPH on the cell surface and its growth conditions used in this study have been described elsewhere [30].…”
Section: Materials Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, OPH was functionally expressed onto the surface of a natural p-nitrophenol (PNP) degrader, Pseudomonas putida JS444, using an ice nucleation protein (INP) anchor, creating a single microorganism with the capability to rapidly degrade organophosphate pesticides and PNP simultaneously while consuming oxygen [30]. Using this genetically engineered Pseudomonas putida we modified the Clark dissolved oxygen electrode, to construct a simple microbial biosensor for rapid, cost-effective, selective, precise and accurate determination of organophosphates with PNP substituent and demonstrated the application to paraoxon, parathion and methyl parathion monitoring [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%