2022
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202205544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Flexible K‐Intercalated MnO2/Carbon Membrane for High‐Performance Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Battery Cathode

Abstract: The layered MnO2 is intensively investigated as one of the most promising cathode materials for aqueous zinc‐ion batteries (AZIBs), but its commercialization is severely impeded by the challenging issues of the inferior intrinsic electronic conductivity and undesirable structural stability during the charge–discharge cycles. Herein, the lab‐prepared flexible carbon membrane with highly electrical conductivity is first used as the matrix to generate ultrathin δ‐MnO2 with an enlarged interlayer spacing induced b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the C-ZM system shows no characteristic peak of ZSH in its XRD spectrum after initial discharge process (Figure S7), and moreover, the GCD curves of discharge-charge and charge-discharge (different sequence, which blocks the influence of ZSH, since it is the byproduct of H + -insertion during the discharge process) process exhibit almost overlap in C-ZM system (Figure S8). More importantly, the reduced specific capacity of MnOC-ZM in Figure S9 (70.0 mAh g -1 ) with the restricted voltage window of 0.9-1.7 V proves that the oxidation reaction at 1.7~1.8 V (not 1.3 V, different from ZSH as reported 15,18,33 ) is vital in the whole energy storage process, demonstrating the ZSH-assisted deposition-dissolution reaction model might not suit to apply in MnO-based cathode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, the C-ZM system shows no characteristic peak of ZSH in its XRD spectrum after initial discharge process (Figure S7), and moreover, the GCD curves of discharge-charge and charge-discharge (different sequence, which blocks the influence of ZSH, since it is the byproduct of H + -insertion during the discharge process) process exhibit almost overlap in C-ZM system (Figure S8). More importantly, the reduced specific capacity of MnOC-ZM in Figure S9 (70.0 mAh g -1 ) with the restricted voltage window of 0.9-1.7 V proves that the oxidation reaction at 1.7~1.8 V (not 1.3 V, different from ZSH as reported 15,18,33 ) is vital in the whole energy storage process, demonstrating the ZSH-assisted deposition-dissolution reaction model might not suit to apply in MnO-based cathode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A better rate performance was achieved in DE, which further proving the better redox reaction kinetic behaviors in DE (Fig. 5 c) [ 55 , 56 ]. Figure 5 d displays the comparison of long cycling stability evaluations in different electrolytes at 0.5 A g −1 , in which a very low capacity retention performance of 55% was delivered along with a small specific capacity of 38.3 mAh g −1 after 700 cycles in BE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…4b and S14 †). Furthermore, beneting from the dynamic [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] compensation of MnOOH, the Zn/MnO 2 battery with the Zn-Ce electrolyte achieved reversible capacity retention of 97.4% and a capacity of 130.1 mA h g −1 at 1 A g −1 aer 1000 cycles (vs. 40.5% and 75.8 mA h g −1 for the Zn/MnO 2 battery with the basic electrolyte), and identical results were obtained at a current density of 0.5 A g −1 (Fig. 4c and d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c and d) Long cycling performance of Zn/MnO 2 batteries with the basic electrolyte and Zn-Ce electrolyte at 0.5 and 1.0 A g −1 . (e) Comparison of electrochemical performance of the Zn/MnO 2 battery based on the Zn-Ce electrolyte with other Zn/MnO 2 batteries reported previously [34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%