2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06129-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using CRISPR RNA with a uridinylate-rich 3′-overhang

Abstract: Genome editing has been harnessed through the development of CRISPR system, and the CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 (Cpf1) system has emerged as a promising alternative to CRISPR-Cas9 for use in various circumstances. Despite the inherent multiple advantages of Cpf1 over Cas9, the adoption of Cpf1 has been unsatisfactory because of target-dependent insufficient indel efficiencies. Here, we report an engineered CRISPR RNA (crRNA) for highly efficient genome editing by Cpf1, which includes a 20-base tar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cas12a has been successfully used for gene editing in vivo without any deleterious offtarget effects (D. Kim et al 2016;Kleinstiver et al 2016; H. K. Kim et al 2017;Tang et al 2018;Moon et al 2018). Our high-throughput pLibrary cleavage analysis indicates that Cas12a can bind and cleave sequences with up to four mismatches in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cas12a has been successfully used for gene editing in vivo without any deleterious offtarget effects (D. Kim et al 2016;Kleinstiver et al 2016; H. K. Kim et al 2017;Tang et al 2018;Moon et al 2018). Our high-throughput pLibrary cleavage analysis indicates that Cas12a can bind and cleave sequences with up to four mismatches in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Though FnCpf1 uses a more common TTN PAM sequence, its cleavage activity is still modest (Tu et al 2017). Editing efficiency of the Cas12a systems has since been enhanced by artificially engineering the crRNA to increase activity without a loss of specificity (Bin Moon et al 2018). Therefore, it is of interest to test various modifications of crRNAs and note their effect on mutagenesis and gene targeting going forward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there was a significant increase in cleavage specificity (0.11~4.15 fold) for chimeric guides ((cr)RNA No. 14,20,21,22,23) that did not induce DNA off-target cleavage ( Figure 4B). For the DNMT1 target gene, consecutive DNA substitutions from the 3′-end of the guide to the eighth nucleotide resulted in less on-target compensation and higher target cleavage specificity than DNA substitutions in the seed region close to the PAM sequence ( Figures 4A, 4B).…”
Section: Target Dna Cleavage Specificity Of Chimeric Dna-rna-guided Cpf1mentioning
confidence: 97%