CRISPR and CRISPR-Cas effector proteins enable the targeting of DNA double-strand breaks to defined loci based on a variable length RNA guide specific to each effector. The guide RNAs are generally similar in size and form, consisting of a ∼20 nucleotide sequence complementary to the DNA target and an RNA secondary structure recognized by the effector. However, the effector proteins vary in protospacer adjacent motif requirements, nuclease activities, and DNA binding kinetics. Recently, ErCas12a, a new member of the Cas12a family, was identified in Eubacterium rectale. Here, we report the first characterization of ErCas12a activity in zebrafish and expand on previously reported activity in human cells. Using a fluorescent reporter system, we show that CRISPR-ErCas12a elicits strand annealing mediated DNA repair more efficiently than CRISPR-Cas9. Further, using our previously reported gene targeting method that utilizes short homology, GeneWeld, we demonstrate the use of CRISPR-ErCas12a to integrate reporter alleles into the genomes of both zebrafish and human cells. Together, this work provides methods for deploying an additional CRISPR-Cas system, thus increasing the flexibility researchers have in applying genome engineering technologies.
The rapid growth of the field of gene editing can largely be attributed to the discovery and optimization of designer endonucleases. These include zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regular interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) systems including Cas9, Cas12a, and structure-guided nucleases. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have proven to be a powerful model system for genome engineering testing and applications due to their external development, high fecundity, and ease of housing. As the zebrafish gene editing toolkit continues to grow, it is becoming increasingly important to understand when and how to utilize which of these technologies for maximum efficacy in a particular project. While CRISPR-Cas9 has brought broad attention to the field of genome engineering in recent years, designer endonucleases have been utilized in genome engineering for more than two decades. This chapter provides a brief overview of designer endonuclease and other gene editing technologies in zebrafish as well as some of their known functional benefits and limitations depending on specific project goals. Finally, selected prospects for additional gene editing tools are presented, promising additional options for directed genomic programming of this versatile animal model system.
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated (Cas) effector proteins enable the direction of DNA double-strand breaks at defined loci based on a variable length RNA guide specific to each effector.The guides are generally similar in size and form, consisting of a ~20 base sequence homologous to the DNA target and a secondary structure used by the effector for guide/nuclease recognition. However, the effector proteins vary in size, DNA binding kinetics, nucleic acid hydrolyzing activities, and Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) requirements. Recently, a Cas12a family member protein named Mad7 was identified that is most similar to the Cas12a from Acidaminococcus sp. Here, we report for the first time Mad7 activity in zebrafish and human cells. We utilize a fluorescent reporter system to demonstrate CRISPR/Mad7 elicits strand annealing mediated DNA repair more efficiently than CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we use CRISPR/Mad7 with our previously reported gene targeting method GeneWeld in order to integrate reporter alleles in both zebrafish and human cells. Together, this work provides methods for deploying an additional CRISPR/Cas system, increasing the flexibility researchers have in applying genome engineering technologies.
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells are engineered with an artificial receptor which redirects T cells to recognize cancer cells expressing a particular surface antigen. CART cell therapy has been astonishingly successful at eradicating certain B cell malignancies, but relapse is common, and efficacy is lacking in many cancers. Gene editing of CART cells is being investigated to enhance efficacy and safety and to develop off-the-shelf products. Currently, genome engineering tools used to modify CART cells include zinc finger nucleases, transposons, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas9. CRISPR-Cas9 uses a trans-activating (tracrRNA): CRISPR RNA (crRNA) duplex to trigger imprecise DNA repair through targeted double stranded breaks, causing indels and often resulting in loss of protein function. Gene-edited CART cells have entered the clinic to provide an allogeneic cell source (TALEN TCRα knockout), safer treatment (CRISPR-Cas9 GM-CSF knockout), and resistance to exhaustion (CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout). CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout (PD-1k/o) CART cells were well-tolerated in a first-in-human clinical trial. However, clinically tested CRISPR-Cas9-edited CART cells showed only modest loss of function (~25%) of PD-1 upon infusion. Additionally, off-target editing has been observed in the clinic and remains a concern. We hypothesized that using next-generation CRISPR-Cas12a systems will result in enhanced editing efficiency and precision. CRISPR-Cas12a has a smaller protein component than CRISPR-Cas9, uses a single crRNA without a tracrRNA for simplified delivery and leaves staggered 5' overhangs. These properties, along with lower intrinsic off-target activity than Cas9, render Cas12a a powerful gene editing tool. First, we compared the knockout efficiency of Cas9 and Cas12a in three therapeutically relevant genetic targets in T cells by delivering ribonucleoprotein complexes containing the crRNA and Cas protein of interest. We showed that Cas12a more effectively knocked out CD3, GM-CSF, and PD-1 expression compared to Cas9 (Figure 1A), demonstrating the potential of Cas12a in further genetically editing T cell therapies. We then used electroporation with Cas9 and Cas12a to generate PD-1k/o in lentivirally transduced CD19-targeted CART (CART19) cells with the aim of making exhaustion-resistant CART19 cells through CRISPR gene editing. CART19 and PD-1k/o CART19 cells were repeatedly stimulated with CD19+ NALM6 target cells for one week, and exhaustion marker expression was measured over time with flow cytometry. The expression of CTLA4, TIM3, and LAG3 were similar between CART19 groups, but PD-1 expression was lower in Cas9 PD-1k/o CART19 cells and almost completely eradicated in Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells compared to wildtype or mock shocked CART19 cells (Figure 1B). We then compared the functionality of wildtype, mock shocked, and Cas9 or Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells in vitro to ensure that neither the electroporation process nor PD-1 knockout impaired CART19 cell antitumor activity. Over a range of effector-to-target ratios and with repeated stimulation with target cells, cytotoxicity was comparable across all CART19 cell groups (Figure 1C). All CART19 cell groups demonstrated robust proliferation in response to both nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation and over one week of repeated antigen stimulation with NALM6 target cells (Figure 1D). We also confirmed that all CART19 cell groups demonstrated strong degranulation and cytokine production in response to nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation, regardless of electroporation or PD-1 knockout (Figure 1E). In summary, our data demonstrate that Cas12a can be used as a gene editing tool to efficiently knock out therapeutically relevant genes in CART19 cell therapy. Additionally, Cas12a demonstrated improved knockout efficiency over Cas9 in three different genomic targets. PD-1 knockout via Cas9 or Cas12a reduced PD-1 expression on the CART19 cell surface, and PD-1 expression was almost completely ablated with Cas12a gene editing. Electroporation and PD-1 knockout did not impact the effector functions of the CART19 cells, including cytotoxicity, degranulation, cytokine secretion, or proliferation. In vivo studies assessing the antitumor efficacy and CART19 cell persistence are ongoing. Overall, Cas12a is a promising, efficient method of gene knockout to enhance the safety and efficacy of CART cells. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Lentigen: Research Funding.
Background:. Poor patient outcomes in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) largely stem from a lack of understanding of therapeutic vulnerabilities and an insufficient armamentarium of effective drugs. The standard of care for most early stage TNBC patients continues to be (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Identifying additional therapeutic options for this subset of patients represents a major unmet need. We and others demonstrated that estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is expressed in about 20% of TN tumors. Prior research has shown that ligand-mediated activation of ERβ decreases proliferation, invasion, and migration in TNBC cell lines. In vivo, ERβ suppresses the growth of cell line xenograft models and prevents the development of metastatic lesions in a ligand dependent manner. Mechanistically, we found that ERβ repurposes EZH2 to suppress oncogenic NFκB signaling and that pharmacologic inhibition of EZH2 diminishes ERβ function and its anti-cancer effects. This research has led to an ongoing clinical trial (NCT03941730) assessing the efficacy of estradiol in ERβ+ TNBC patients with chemorefractory disease. As with all therapies, patients will exhibit de novo and acquired resistance and therefore we sought to understand the mechanisms of resistance to ERβ targeted therapies. Methods:. Using multiple models of ERβ positive TNBC, we developed ERβ resistant cell lines through chronic exposure to estradiol and the ERβ specific agonist LY500307 over a period of 8 months. We employed RNA sequencing to characterize the transcriptomic changes which occurred following ERβ resistance. We profiled XIST expression across multiple publicly available datasets, including TCGA, Metabric, BEAUTY, and GTEx. XIST expression was also modulated using CRISPR/Cas9 to assess subsequent effects on TNBC cell biology, ERβ function, and response to ERβ targeted therapies. Results:. Our resistant cell line models of ERβ positive TNBC maintained ERβ expression, but were no longer growth inhibited by ERβ agonists. RNAseq revealed substantial differences comparing the transcriptome of resistant versus sensitive cell lines, of which the most increased transcript in the resistant setting was the lncRNA XIST. XIST is best known for its role in X-chromosome inactivation through recruitment and association with the PRC2 complex, and thus EZH2. However, little is known about its functions in breast cancer. We therefore assessed the expression levels of XIST in breast tumors and cell lines. XIST expression was highly variable in breast cancer, was found in a proportion of all breast cancer sub-types and did not correlate with ERβ status. However, XIST expression was up-regulated in ERβ expressing cell lines following long term estrogen treatment. No effects on XIST expression were identified in multiple ERα positive models following estrogen, SERM/SERD treatment, or estrogen deprivation. Furthermore, upregulation of XIST was not associated with resistance to Paclitaxel or Doxorubicin, suggesting XIST is not a part of a broad resistance phenotype. Strikingly, CRISPR mediated knockout of XIST in ERβ resistant cells completely re-sensitized cells to ERβ targeted therapies suggesting that XIST expression is a critical component of ERβ resistance. Conclusions:. ERβ represents a relevant therapeutic target that is being tested in clinical trials. Using multiple in vitro models, we provide evidence that XIST expression is sufficient to induce resistance to. ERβ targeted therapies in TNBC and may therefore represent a relevant biomarker for patient stratification. Further strategies to suppress XIST expression may elicit anti-cancer effects on their own and may resensitize a sub-set of ERβ resistant tumors to ERβ agonists. Citation Format: Michael J Emch, Kirsten GM Aspros, Elizabeth S Bruinsma, Krishna R Kalari, Calley J Jones, Brandon W Simone, Matthew P Goetz, John R Hawse. The lncRNA XIST mediates sensitivity to ERβ targeted therapies in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-09.
The development of CRISPR-associated proteins, such as Cas9, has led to increased accessibility and ease of use in genome editing. However, additional tools are needed to quantify and identify successful genome editing events in living animals. We developed a method to rapidly quantify and monitor gene editing activity non-invasively in living animals that also facilitates confocal microscopy and nucleotide level analyses. Here we report a new CRISPR “fingerprinting” approach to activating luciferase and fluorescent proteins in mice as a function of gene editing. This system is based on experience with our prior cre recombinase (cre)-detector system and is designed for Cas editors able to target loxP including gRNAs for SaCas9 and ErCas12a. These CRISPRs cut specifically within loxP, an approach that is a departure from previous gene editing in vivo activity detection techniques that targeted adjacent stop sequences. In this sensor paradigm, CRISPR activity was monitored non-invasively in living cre reporter mice (FVB.129S6(B6)-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(Luc)Kael/J and Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP)Luo/J, which will be referred to as LSL-luciferase and mT/mG throughout the paper) after intramuscular or intravenous hydrodynamic plasmid injections, demonstrating utility in two diverse organ systems. The same genome-editing event was examined at the cellular level in specific tissues by confocal microscopy to determine the identity and frequency of successfully genome-edited cells. Further, SaCas9 induced targeted editing at efficiencies that were comparable to cre, demonstrating high effective delivery and activity in a whole animal. This work establishes genome editing tools and models to track CRISPR editing in vivo non-invasively and to fingerprint the identity of targeted cells. This approach also enables similar utility for any of the thousands of previously generated loxP animal models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.