2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Competitive Reindeer Males Control Female Behavior during the Rut

Abstract: During the rut, female ungulates move among harems or territories, either to sample mates or to avoid harassment. Females may be herded by a male, may stay with a preferred male, or aggregate near a dominant male to avoid harassment from other males. In fission-fusion group dynamics, female movement is best described by the group’s fission probability, instead of inter-harem movement. In this study, we tested whether male herding ability, female mate choice or harassment avoidance influence fission probability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of this trade-off does not constrain, therefore, fission-fusion group dynamics. Consequently, harassment avoidance does not explain the observed decrease of fission-fusion group dynamics during the rut nor the increase of group size during the rut (Body et al 2015), which are best explained by the herding behaviour of males (Body et al 2014). An efficient strategy to get around this conflict or trade-off might be to decrease female foraging competition, for instance by maintaining long-term bonds among females as seen in feral horses (Cameron et al 2009), but this remains to be investigated in reindeer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The existence of this trade-off does not constrain, therefore, fission-fusion group dynamics. Consequently, harassment avoidance does not explain the observed decrease of fission-fusion group dynamics during the rut nor the increase of group size during the rut (Body et al 2015), which are best explained by the herding behaviour of males (Body et al 2014). An efficient strategy to get around this conflict or trade-off might be to decrease female foraging competition, for instance by maintaining long-term bonds among females as seen in feral horses (Cameron et al 2009), but this remains to be investigated in reindeer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although being in a group has been widely reported to decrease the harassment level received by females when compared to solitary females Byers et al 1994), our results suggest that females are equally negatively affected in large and small mating groups. The increase of reindeer group size during the breeding season is not the result of a harassment avoidance through the dilution effect per se, but a consequence of male herding behaviour (Body et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that deer groups increased both their MGS and NDR immediately following fission, which should increase the efficacy of their extensive search mode [49]. The release in movement constraints that result from group fission could explain the weak group cohesion that has often been reported in many gregarious foragers [5053]. We know that the probability of observing the fission of a roe deer group increased with group size [38] and that the larger groups are slower [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), sex (Winnie and Creel , Body et al. , Patrick and Weimerskirch ), and reproductive status (Steyaert et al. , Lesmerises et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%