2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher susceptibility of beech to drought in comparison to oak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, tree growth of diffuse porous species such as beech is found to be more responsive to stress than ring porous species such as oak (Meyer et al, 2020). This may explain the differences observed in this study between the beech stands at the Darney site and the oak stands trees at the Champenoux site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In general, tree growth of diffuse porous species such as beech is found to be more responsive to stress than ring porous species such as oak (Meyer et al, 2020). This may explain the differences observed in this study between the beech stands at the Darney site and the oak stands trees at the Champenoux site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These authors hypothesized this observation to be caused by post-drought photosynthesis upregulation and carbon allocation in favor of canopy repair (recovering NDVI) at the expense of secondary growth (reducing tree-ring width). In another study, the link between NDVI and secondary tree-growth differed between non-drought and drought conditions (Meyer et al, 2020 ): while tree-ring width was most closely linked with the start of season NDVI under non-drought conditions, peak-season NDVI better reflected secondary growth decline under drought conditions. The link of spring NDVI with tree-growth under normal conditions is probably caused by the overarching effect of spring conditions on secondary growth of trees growing in temperate climates (Buras et al, 2018 ; Kannenberg et al, 2019 ), while the link under drought conditions with summer NDVI likely reflects early leaf coloration or senescence which result in reduced ring-widths (Meyer et al, 2020 ; Schuldt et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In another study, the link between NDVI and secondary tree-growth differed between non-drought and drought conditions (Meyer et al, 2020 ): while tree-ring width was most closely linked with the start of season NDVI under non-drought conditions, peak-season NDVI better reflected secondary growth decline under drought conditions. The link of spring NDVI with tree-growth under normal conditions is probably caused by the overarching effect of spring conditions on secondary growth of trees growing in temperate climates (Buras et al, 2018 ; Kannenberg et al, 2019 ), while the link under drought conditions with summer NDVI likely reflects early leaf coloration or senescence which result in reduced ring-widths (Meyer et al, 2020 ; Schuldt et al, 2020 ). On the global scale, the relationship between secondary growth and canopy greenness is further modified by tree-species, climate zone, and integration period of the NDVI signal (Vicente-Serrano et al, 2016 ; Bhuyan et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Little] along the Pacific coast of British Columbia (BC), Canada and Alaska, United States (Schaberg et al, 2008;Hennon et al, 2012) and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) in eastern forests of North America (Bourque et al, 2005). Predicting the response of forests to climate is highly species-specific, as tree species have unique environmental adaptions and competitive strategies (Lévesque et al, 2013;Meyer et al, 2020), and within a species there can be divergence in climate-growth responses through time (D'Arrigo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%