2007
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2007.1852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher order weak linearizations of stochastically driven nonlinear oscillators

Abstract: We present derivative-free weak and strong solutions of stochastically driven nonlinear oscillators of engineering interest using higher order forms of the locally transversal linearization (LTL) method. Unlike strong solutions, weak stochastic solutions attempt to predict only mathematical expectations of functions of the true solution and are obtainable with much less computational effort. The linearized equations corresponding to the higher order implicit LTL schemes are arrived at using backward Euler–Maru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the concept of local linearization (Roy, 2001), the linearization point (such that U* :¼ U(t*)) could be chosen anywhere in the closed interval without affecting the formal error order in terms of the step size h i :¼ t i+1 À t i . While our present choice of t* = t i yields the explicit phase space linearization (PSL) (Roy, 2000), choosing t* = t i+1 results in the implicit locally transversal linearization (LTL) (Roy, 2004;Saha and Roy, 2007).…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the concept of local linearization (Roy, 2001), the linearization point (such that U* :¼ U(t*)) could be chosen anywhere in the closed interval without affecting the formal error order in terms of the step size h i :¼ t i+1 À t i . While our present choice of t* = t i yields the explicit phase space linearization (PSL) (Roy, 2000), choosing t* = t i+1 results in the implicit locally transversal linearization (LTL) (Roy, 2004;Saha and Roy, 2007).…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the concept of local linearization [25], the linearization point t * (such that l * := l(t * )) could be chosen anywhere in the closed interval [t, t + t] without affecting the formal error order. While choosing t * = t yields the explicit phase space linearization (PSL) [26], t * = t + t results in the implicit locally transversal linearization (LTL) [27,28]. Denoting h = t k+1 −t k to be the time step and l k := l(t k ), the explicit PSL map corresponding to the continuous update (5) is written as…”
Section: A Deterministic Pseudo-dynamical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of local (or conditional) statistical linearization has been used by various authors for developing numerical schemes in order to calculate the response pdf of SDEs [61,62]. Local linearization has been more widely used in solving nonlinear deterministic and SDEs in the time domain (see [63,64] and references therein). To complete the formulation of the LSL problem (5.2) at any point (α 0 , β 0 ) of the RE phase space, we have to calculate the coefficients A 0 , B 0 .…”
Section: (B) Localized Statistical Linearizationmentioning
confidence: 99%