Higher Education for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Approach—What, Where and Who Is Doing Research in This Subject?

Abstract

Contextualization: From a very early age, assuming more prominence over the last decades, issues related to sustainability have been taking on a particular interest in the field of research. Although initially the basic concern was at the level of environmental sustainability, the truth is that, progressively, education for sustainability, deeply linked to the science of sustainability, constitutes, together with the latter, the scientific basis for education for the sustainability in higher education, thus emerging a research niche capable of providing greater openness and interaction between higher education institutions and their surroundings. Main aims of the study: Due to the importance that this issue assumes, this article seeks to address the issue of sustainability in higher education, giving particular focus to the analysis at the level of studies that have been developed, which are the main countries and institutions where this has been most researched, as well as which main researchers have been working on this issue. Methodology: For this purpose, and using information taken from the Scopus Database, a bibliometric analysis was carried out, which based on the items “higher education” and “sustainability” allowed to identify a set of 4410 publications. Main results: The results obtained allow to conclude that the number of publications in this area has been observing a significant increase over the last 30 years, with the United States, UK, Spain, Australia and Germany emerging as the countries which publish the most, and within these the Leuphana Universitat Luneburg, RMIT, Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg, Manchester Metropolitan and the Arizona State universities that most publish in this field of research. The five main researchers in the field of higher education for sustainability, were also highlighted. Main contributions: Theoretical and practical contributions were highlighgted, namely, the contribution for government entities and the respective HEIs to reflect on the possible synergies to be developed, as well as to establish strategies and policies promoters of a more efficient and effective investment in research in higher education for sustainability.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability Education in Tourism Universities

“…Although there are many bibliometric studies on sustainable education in universities (Grosseck et al, 2019; Hallinger & Chatpinyakoop, 2019; Machado & Davim, 2022), they have yet to focus on analysing this approach in tourism. For this reason, this study focused on exploring the educational system for sustainability in tourism universities.…”

Sustainability in the Modernization of Higher Education: Curricular Transformation and Sustainable Campus—A Literature Review

“…Aware of the importance that HEIs have assumed over the last few years as promoters of sustainability, Machado and Davim [117] developed a study, based on a bibliometric analysis and with information taken from the Scopus Database, in which they intended to analyze the issue of sustainability in higher education. More specifically, these authors analyzed which main studies have been developed, which are the main countries and institutions where these issues have been investigated the most, as well as which main researchers have been working on this problem.…”

Generation Z, sustainability orientation and higher education implications: An ecopedagogical conceptual framework

“…Governments and other key stakeholders should ensure that debates about sustainability agendas are collectively centred around the HEIs' core priorities, values and learning outcomes (El-Jardali et al, 2018). Similarly, Machado and Davim (2022) recommend investigating and developing critical tools and frameworks for diverse HEI and Government contexts and emphasise the crucial significance of broader policy implications since these integrate into the acknowledgement and promotion of sustainability concerns. Notwithstanding these acknowledgements in extant discourse, Cheeseman et al (2019) observe limited research attention focusing specifically on assessing the implications of government and institutional policy to practice in HEIs.…”