1972
DOI: 10.2307/2494147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher Civil Servants in the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs: Some Demographic and Career Characteristics, 1905-1916

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review.One of those organs of tsarist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clean hands and the white collar put him, however symbolically, on the side of the rich' (Hobsbawm, 1996: 193). Similarly, the sociological and historiographical literature has argued that, in several historical cases, the public employee is one of the subjects that make up the middle class, together with artisans, the self-employed, liberal professionals, employees, traders and intellectuals (Röhl, 1967;Bowney, 1972;Stearns, 1979;Blumin, 1985;Archer and Blau, 1993;Kocka, 1995;Hobsbawm, 1996;Porter, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clean hands and the white collar put him, however symbolically, on the side of the rich' (Hobsbawm, 1996: 193). Similarly, the sociological and historiographical literature has argued that, in several historical cases, the public employee is one of the subjects that make up the middle class, together with artisans, the self-employed, liberal professionals, employees, traders and intellectuals (Röhl, 1967;Bowney, 1972;Stearns, 1979;Blumin, 1985;Archer and Blau, 1993;Kocka, 1995;Hobsbawm, 1996;Porter, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%