2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-uranium matrix effect in zircon and its implications for SHRIMP U–Pb age determinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8), are positively correlated with U. This is consistent with the findings of White and Ireland (2012) that SHRIMP analysis of higher-U zircon yielded erroneous ages related to instrumental fractionation or matrix effects. Alternatively, the positive correlation could be explained by the addition of Pb to the zircon (e.g., Williams et al, 1984) or removal of U (less likely, given the high U concentrations); either of these could result in the same relationship.…”
Section: Rift Magmatism and Comparison With The Border Riftsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…8), are positively correlated with U. This is consistent with the findings of White and Ireland (2012) that SHRIMP analysis of higher-U zircon yielded erroneous ages related to instrumental fractionation or matrix effects. Alternatively, the positive correlation could be explained by the addition of Pb to the zircon (e.g., Williams et al, 1984) or removal of U (less likely, given the high U concentrations); either of these could result in the same relationship.…”
Section: Rift Magmatism and Comparison With The Border Riftsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Exceptionally high concentrations in U or analysis of metamict domains in zircon can be a cause of reverse discordance, owing to matrix-related ion yield effects (Williams and Hergt, 2000;White and Ireland, 2012;Kusiak et al, 2013). Neither elevated U concentrations nor significant metamict alteration in zircon domains have been observed.…”
Section: U-pb (Zircon) Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). White and Ireland (2012) have shown that Jurassic high-U zircons which show an apparent U-concentration effect are metamict, according to the spectral featured described in Nasdala et al (1995).…”
Section: High-uranium Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ∼ 36 Ma Raumid and ∼ 180 Ma Red Hill (Williams and Hergt, 2000;White and Ireland, 2012) zircons show a 274 excess up to about 0.1. However, the 0.8 Ma Bishop Tuff zircons, which do not seem to exhibit this high-uranium effect (Chamberlain et al, 2014;Ickert et al, 2015), have only one analytical spot with a 274 above 0.025, and none above (Fig.…”
Section: High-uranium Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation