To test existing models for the formation of the Amerasian Basin, detrital zircon suites from 12 samples of Triassic sandstone from the circum‐Arctic region were dated by laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS). The northern Verkhoyansk (NE Russia) has Permo‐Carboniferous (265–320 Ma) and Cambro‐Silurian (410–505 Ma) zircon populations derived via river systems from the active Baikal Mountain region along the southern Siberian craton. Chukotka, Wrangel Island (Russia), and the Lisburne Hills (western Alaska) also have Permo‐Carboniferous (280–330 Ma) and late Precambrian‐Silurian (420–580 Ma) zircons in addition to Permo‐Triassic (235–265 Ma), Devonian (340–390 Ma), and late Precambrian (1000–1300 Ma) zircons. These ages suggest at least partial derivation from the Taimyr, Siberian Trap, and/or east Urals regions of Arctic Russia. The northerly derived Ivishak Formation (Sadlerochit Mountains, Alaska) and Pat Bay Formation (Sverdrup Basin, Canada) are dominated by Cambrian–latest Precambrian (500–600 Ma) and 445–490 Ma zircons. Permo‐Carboniferous and Permo‐Triassic zircons are absent. The Bjorne Formation (Sverdrup Basin), derived from the south, differs from other samples studied with mostly 1130–1240 Ma and older Precambrian zircons in addition to 430–470 Ma zircons. The most popular plate tectonic model for the origin of the Amerasian Basin involves counterclockwise rotation of the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate away from the Canadian Arctic margin. The detrital zircon data suggest that the Chukotka part of the microplate originated closer to the Taimyr and Verkhoyansk, east of the Polar Urals of Russia, and not from the Canadian Arctic.
The South Anyui suture zone consists of late Paleozoic-Jurassic ultramafic rocks and Jurassic-Cretaceous pre-, syn-, and postcollisional sedimentary rocks. It represents the closure of a Mesozoic ocean basin that separated two microcontinents in northeastern Russia, the Kolyma-Omolon block and the Chukotka block. In order to understand the geologic history and improve our understanding of Mesozoic paleogeography of the Arctic region, we obtained U-Pb ages on pre-and postcollisional igneous rocks and detrital zircons from sandstone in the suture zone. We identified four groups of sedimentary rocks: (1) Triassic sandstone deposited on the southern margin of Chukotka;(2) Middle Jurassic volcanogenic sandstone that was derived from the Oloy arc, a continental margin arc, along the Kolyma-Omolon block, south of the Anyui Ocean, a sample of which yielded no pre-Jurassic zircons and a single peak at 164 Ma; (3) suture zone sandstone that yielded Late Jurassic maximum depositional ages and likely predated the collision; and (4) a Mid-Cretaceous syncollisional sandstone that had a maximum depositional age of 125 Ma. These rocks were intruded by postkinematic plutons and dikes with ages of 109 Ma and 101 Ma that postdate the collision. We present a seismic-reflection line through the South Anyui suture zone that indicates south-vergence of thrusting of the Chukotka block over the Kolyma-Omolon block, opposite of most existing models and opposite of the vergence in the Angayucham suture zone, the postulated along-strike equivalent in Alaska. This suggests that Chukotka and Arctic Alaska may have different pre-Cretaceous histories, which could solve space problems with existing reconstructions of the Arctic region. We combine our detrital zircon data and interpretations of the seismic line to construct a new GPlates model for the Mesozoic evolution of the region that decouples Chukotka and Arctic Alaska to solve space problems with previous Arctic reconstructions.
Field observations and U-Pb isotopic data from plutonic and high-grade metamorphic rocks within the Kigluaik gneiss dome on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, document a Late Cretaceous age of peak metamorphism and shed light on the relationship between fundamentally mantlederived magmatism and the development of the gneiss dome. The dome consists of upper-amphibolite-facies to granulitefacies metasedimentary rocks mantling the granitoid Kigluaik pluton. The main deformational fabric in the dome is a welldefined, moderately dipping foliation and compositional layering that contains a pervasive, east-west trending mineralelongation lineation defined by sillimanite and hornblende. Leucosomal segregations in migmatite are boudinaged and isoclinally folded, and late-stage tension gashes are filled with melt, demonstrating that most deformation occurred at peak metamorphic temperatures. The large pluton in the core of the dome consists of a granitic cap overlying a mafic to intermediate root. Mafic pillows with crenulate margins and spectacular magma mingling textures indicate that the two magmas were coeval. The Kigluaik pluton is largely undeformed and discordant, although some dikes possess a weak deformational fabric. The lack of quench textures at the margins of the pluton and very limited alteration in adjacent wall rock suggest that the pluton was emplaced while country rocks were still at high temperatures. U-Pb analyses of three fractions of zircon from a highly strained and concordant garnet-bearing granite orthogneiss yield an intrusive age of 105 Ma; therefore significant deformation in the dome must have occurred after 105 Ma. Several U-Pb analyses of monazite from metapelite and pegmatite (derived from partial melting of metapelite) yield an age of 91 _+ 1 Ma for high-temperature metamorphism and deformation. U-Pb analysis of eight fractions of zircon from the Kigluaik pluton shows that it crystallized at 92 + 2 Ma. Thus there is both field and geochronologic evidence for coeval magmatism, metamorphism, and deformation at about 92 Ma, which may represent the latest stages of a more protracted tectonic event. We present a model for gneiss dome development wherein a large, silicic to intermediate magmatic diapir with its mantling gneisses ascended from --35 km to --15 km during an
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.