2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ib20187a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput identification of putative receptors for cancer-binding peptides using biopanning and microarray analysis

Abstract: Phage-display peptide biopanning has been successfully used to identify cancer-targeting peptides in multiple models. For cancer-binding peptides, identification of the peptide receptor is necessary to demonstrate mechanism of action and to further optimize specificity and target binding. The process of receptor identification can be slow and some peptides may turn out to bind ubiquitous proteins not suitable for further drug development. In this report, we describe a high-throughput method for screening a lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, if the screening targets are known, further researches can be conducted to validate peptide properties such as effects on cell cycle, cell proliferation, cell migration and apoptosis (Kim et al 2014 ). In addition, investigators have already developed an efficient method for screening a large number of peptides in parallel to identify peptide receptors or targeting sites, which was termed as “reverse biopanning” (Ferraro et al 2013 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, if the screening targets are known, further researches can be conducted to validate peptide properties such as effects on cell cycle, cell proliferation, cell migration and apoptosis (Kim et al 2014 ). In addition, investigators have already developed an efficient method for screening a large number of peptides in parallel to identify peptide receptors or targeting sites, which was termed as “reverse biopanning” (Ferraro et al 2013 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Biopanning steps (modified from Kügler et al). (1) mimicked binding phages to targets, (2) washing away unbound phages, (3) eluting off specific bound phages, (4) enriching the specifically bound phages for next round of biopanning In vitro biopanning is usually chosen for a variety of targets on cell surface or molecules, which includes biopanning on the immobilized molecules (Rahbarnia et al 2017 ; Zhao et al 2018 ), solution biopanning (Fouladi et al 2019 ; Thanongsaksrikul et al 2018 ), selection on whole cells (Carneiro et al 2014 ; Li et al 2017 ; Yeh et al 2016 ), reverse biopanning (Ferraro et al 2013 ), display of established internalizing peptides (Rangel et al 2012 ). Molecules screening by this approach are more likely to keep native conformation, and recognize specific post-translational modifications (Kehoe et al 2006 ; Velappan et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Biopanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we developed and evaluated 2C6F3, a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to TIP-1 for radioimmunotherapy. TIP-1 is overexpressed in various cancers including lung cancer [14], breast cancer [9] and glioblastoma [10]. TIP-1 consists of a single PDZ domain and has been showed to have various biological functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation provided support for the specific accumulation of targeted NPs in irradiated tumors compared with nonradiated tumors and normal tissues. A landmark finding in chemo-radiotherapy was the discovery of radiation-inducible translocation of the predominantly intracellular Tax interacting protein 1 (TIP-1, also known as Tax1 binding protein 3, Tax1BP3) on the plasma membrane of a variety of tumor types (e.g., lung, colon, liver metastases, glioblastoma, breast and pancreatic cancers) [22][23][24][25][26], providing a novel, targetable tumor marker. TIP-1 translocates to the plasma membrane of tumor endothelial cells as early as 3 h and persists for up to 72 h following irradiation in a dose-dependent way [23].…”
Section: Protein Translocation To the Cell Membrane By Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%