2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High strength carbon-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites additively manufactured by screw-based extrusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, while the tensile strength of the CCF-PA6 specimen at 150 C only amounts to 50.8% of the room temperature counterpart, it is still among the highest compared with other 3D-printed thermoplastics reinforced by short fibers. 3,33 At 100 C, tensile strength of the printed specimen reached 294.1 MPa, which is comparable to the strength of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy at room temperature (310 MPa). 36 It is also worth noticing that, the mechanical performance of the 3D-printed CCF-PA6 specimens at elevated temperatures can be further improved by fine-tuning the printing parameters, such reducing the layer thickness and hatch spacing.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of the 3dprinted Ccf-pa6mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, while the tensile strength of the CCF-PA6 specimen at 150 C only amounts to 50.8% of the room temperature counterpart, it is still among the highest compared with other 3D-printed thermoplastics reinforced by short fibers. 3,33 At 100 C, tensile strength of the printed specimen reached 294.1 MPa, which is comparable to the strength of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy at room temperature (310 MPa). 36 It is also worth noticing that, the mechanical performance of the 3D-printed CCF-PA6 specimens at elevated temperatures can be further improved by fine-tuning the printing parameters, such reducing the layer thickness and hatch spacing.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of the 3dprinted Ccf-pa6mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…To evaluate the porosity of the 3D‐printed specimens, the density and weight of each specimen was measured with a high‐precision scale. The porosity of the 3D‐printed CCF‐PA6 specimens can be determined by Equations () and() 33 : P=VaVtVa, Vt=M×mfρf+M×mmρm, where V a and V t stand for the actual volume and theoretical volume of the 3D‐printed specimen. The actual volume can be directly measured; whereas the theoretical volume can be calculated by summing the volumes of CF and PA matrix (Equation ()), where M stands for the weight of the printed specimens, and mf, ρf, mm, and ρm are the mass fraction and density of the fiber and PA6 resin, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, extrusion-injection molding technology of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer composites has become the focus of research interest due to its advantages of low cost and flexible design [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Martin et al [ 18 ] prepared oriented chopped carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites with anisotropic mechanical properties and thermal conductivity using extrusion additive manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of carbon fiber (CF) into polymer matrices is a widely used approach to improve the mechanical and wear properties [6][7][8]. While the approach is effective and convenient, excessive amounts of CF can lead to high viscosity during processing, resulting in several issues such as poor dispersion, incomplete interfacial compatibility, and unreliable product stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues ultimately hamper the overall performance [9,10]. Li et al [8] found that internal defects in CF/PA6 composites were responsible for decreased tensile strength. The concentration of 35 wt.% CF hindered the flow of the polymer matrix, causing increased porosity and inadequate impregnation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%