2016
DOI: 10.1111/jace.14235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Strength B4C–TaB2 Eutectic Composites Obtained via In Situ by Spark Plasma Sintering

Abstract: The in situ synthesis/consolidation of B 4 C-TaB 2 eutectic composites by spark plasma sintering (SPS) is reported. Samples for the evaluation of bending strength were cut from specimens with diameters of 30 mm. The sample prepared for the threepoint flexural strength test had fibers of tantalum diboride with diameter of 1.3 AE 0.4 lm distributed in the B 4 C matrix, thereby reducing composites brittleness and yielding an indentation fracture toughness of up to 4.5 MPaÁm 1/2 . Furthermore, the Vickers hardness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although plastic deformation appears to control the fracture at 1800°C, the specimen has an elastic end to the load–displacement curve starting at a stress of 373 MPa. This has some nonlinear deviations, which in eutectic composites suggests the formation of micro‐ and macrocracks during fracture, which can be observed during the fracture of layered materials . However, in the present study, this is an indication of fatigue‐like creep‐induced fracture, which occurred during plastic deformation and was caused by some grains are being separated at specific crystallographic orientation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Although plastic deformation appears to control the fracture at 1800°C, the specimen has an elastic end to the load–displacement curve starting at a stress of 373 MPa. This has some nonlinear deviations, which in eutectic composites suggests the formation of micro‐ and macrocracks during fracture, which can be observed during the fracture of layered materials . However, in the present study, this is an indication of fatigue‐like creep‐induced fracture, which occurred during plastic deformation and was caused by some grains are being separated at specific crystallographic orientation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Here one may observe the appearance of NbB 2 subgrains which fracture in a different manner when compared to Figure G,I. At 1200°C (Figure D), these subgrains have a needle‐like shape, that is similar to a fracture of the eutectic B 4 C–NbB 2 or B 4 C–TaB 2 ceramic composites at HT. Some of these needle‐shaped grains appeared at 1200°C, coinciding with strength increase in for DDCCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Mechanical properties of these samples are listed in Table . Young's modulus decreases from 556 to 498 GPa with the addition of more (B 4 C, Si), since TaC (567 GPa) has a higher inherent Young's modulus than TaB 2 (560 GPa) and SiC (460 GPa) . Fracture toughness of TaC‐TaB 2 ‐SiC ceramics ranges from 3.26 to 3.59 MPa∙m 1/2 , which is comparable with TaC ceramics (3.5 MPa∙m 1/2 ) and TaC‐TaB 2 ceramics (3.4 MPa∙m 1/2 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Young's modulus decreases from 556 to 498 GPa with the addition of more (B 4 C, Si), since TaC (567 GPa) has a higher inherent Young's modulus than TaB 2 (560 GPa) and SiC (460 GPa). [23][24][25] Fracture toughness of TaC-TaB 2 -SiC ceramics ranges from 3.26 to 3.59 MPa•m 1/2 , which is comparable with TaC ceramics (3.5 MPa•m 1/2 ) and TaC-TaB 2 ceramics (3.4 MPa•m 1/2 ). 8 Generally, fracture toughness varies little with composition, as seen from Table 2, and the TBS-15 sample exhibits better fracture toughness than the other samples.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 90%