2007
DOI: 10.1117/1.2741217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed digital image correlation: error estimations and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation errors include background noise in the image ͑which can be enhanced by increasing the image gain͒ and the quantization of grayscale values. In Siebert et al ͑2007͒, either one of these errors was less than 0.05 pixels, at worst. The reconstruction errors were caused by uncertainties in the calibration of the 3D-DIC system.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Measurement Accuracymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlation errors include background noise in the image ͑which can be enhanced by increasing the image gain͒ and the quantization of grayscale values. In Siebert et al ͑2007͒, either one of these errors was less than 0.05 pixels, at worst. The reconstruction errors were caused by uncertainties in the calibration of the 3D-DIC system.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Measurement Accuracymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Errors in high speed DIC measurements were investigated by Siebert et al ͑2007͒, and may be categorized as ͑1͒ correlation errors and ͑2͒ reconstruction errors. Correlation errors include background noise in the image ͑which can be enhanced by increasing the image gain͒ and the quantization of grayscale values.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Measurement Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern provided by Dantec Dynamics has been optimized for DIC measurements. The cameras are calibrated and the image correlation parameters are selected to minimize the experimental error, following the recommendations given by Siebert et al [55].…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumes the deformation was calculated using high-quality pictures, an ideally speckled test article, and a perfect calibration. Studies have shown that errors introduced in the calibration procedure [19] and through the interpolation of pixel intensity due to low-contrast speckles [20] are non-negligible. Sicard and Sirohi [13] concluded that including these additional sources of error causes the accuracy to be on the order of 0.01 pixels for in-plane displacements and 0.1 pixels for out-of-plane displacements.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Dic Measurements and Modal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%