2013 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--19676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High School Students Modeling Behaviors During Engineering Design

Abstract: is a research assistant and Ph.D. candidate in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation department at Purdue University. Additionally, he is an engineering and technology instructor at Richland Senior High School (7-12) in Johnstown, Pa. Tanner has experience writing integrated STEM curriculum and delivering professional development workshops on ITEEA's Engineering by Design program. His research interests include modeling and design in STEM education, as well as STEM teacher professional development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, engineering activities that do include math often do so minimally and/or simplistically. In one study of high school students in an engineering class, 36% of their time was spent on math-related tasks, a significant time allotment (computer-aided design and sketching consumed the remaining time) [27]. Yet of this dedicated math time, 23% was categorized as "description" (quantifying dimensions and calculating costs), 9% as "function" (typically simplistic, such as calculating area), and just 4% as "explanation" (informing design decisions).…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, engineering activities that do include math often do so minimally and/or simplistically. In one study of high school students in an engineering class, 36% of their time was spent on math-related tasks, a significant time allotment (computer-aided design and sketching consumed the remaining time) [27]. Yet of this dedicated math time, 23% was categorized as "description" (quantifying dimensions and calculating costs), 9% as "function" (typically simplistic, such as calculating area), and just 4% as "explanation" (informing design decisions).…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%