2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03033756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High risk HPV types in southern Iranian patients with cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence in others studies were variable; and this variability may be contributed to ethnic and geographic factors. The prevalence rate of HPV 16 among Iranian patients [21] with cervical carcinoma was reported to be 6.7%. In the present study, the prevalence of HPV 16 among patients with cervical cancer was higher [22] than Croatia (50%), Australia (53%), Thailand (41%), Italy (32.6%), China (48.8%), and the Philippines (43.9%); and was lower than in Colombia (69.9%), Spain (66.4%), and Morocco (72.4%) [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence in others studies were variable; and this variability may be contributed to ethnic and geographic factors. The prevalence rate of HPV 16 among Iranian patients [21] with cervical carcinoma was reported to be 6.7%. In the present study, the prevalence of HPV 16 among patients with cervical cancer was higher [22] than Croatia (50%), Australia (53%), Thailand (41%), Italy (32.6%), China (48.8%), and the Philippines (43.9%); and was lower than in Colombia (69.9%), Spain (66.4%), and Morocco (72.4%) [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Morocco, 70.5% of invasive carcinoma cases were HPV positive, 34.88% cases had HPV16, and 15.5% cases had HPV18 [52]. In Iran, controversial data were reported; 73.9% of HPV positive cacx contained HPV16 [53], while in another study HPV16 was identified in 26.7% and none of the samples were positive for HPV18 [54]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network structure and concurrency of partnerships play a major role in HIV transmission (Farjadian et al 2003; Kretzschmar et al 1996; Morris 1997; Watts et al 1992): a monogamous member of a stable sexual partnership can be at high risk of infection because of connection through a primary partner, or a partner of a primary partner, to a high-risk sexual network. Conversely, a person with frequent partnership change remains at low risk if his/her network is closed with low risk of HIV penetration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%