2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-39999-2_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Reynolds Number Computation for Turbulent Heat Transfer in a Pipe Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been extensive numerical study of turbulent flows in smooth-wall pipes (Eggels et al 1994;Loulou et al 1997;Satake, Kunugi & Himeno 2000;Wagner, Hüttl & Friedrich 2001;Wu & Moin 2008;Chin et al 2010;Saha et al 2011), there is limited literature for a turbulent flow in a rough-wall pipe. Simulation of a turbulent flow in a pipe with two-dimensional roughness was conducted by Blackburn, Ooi & Chong (2007) where the effects of the corrugation height for a fixed corrugation wavelength were investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been extensive numerical study of turbulent flows in smooth-wall pipes (Eggels et al 1994;Loulou et al 1997;Satake, Kunugi & Himeno 2000;Wagner, Hüttl & Friedrich 2001;Wu & Moin 2008;Chin et al 2010;Saha et al 2011), there is limited literature for a turbulent flow in a rough-wall pipe. Simulation of a turbulent flow in a pipe with two-dimensional roughness was conducted by Blackburn, Ooi & Chong (2007) where the effects of the corrugation height for a fixed corrugation wavelength were investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Ha= 0 and 32.5, sweep can be clearly observed from the wall to the channel center. At high-Reynolds number pipe flow, large-scale sweep has also been observed by Satake et al 21 However, at Ha= 65, sweep regions are limited to regions close to the wall. This is also evidence of the relationship between sweep and Reynolds stress distribution ͑see Fig.…”
Section: ͑10͒mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Redjem-Saad et al [21] compared RMS temperature fluctuations and turbulent heat flux for 0.026 Pr 1.0 at Re t ¼ 186 with the channel flow DNS data of Kawamura et al [24]. Both Redjem-Saad et al [21] and Satake et al [20] calculated the turbulent Prandtl number profile. Their results showed agreement with Kawamura et al [24] in the vicinity of the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They found that (2) predicted the mean profile reasonably for Re t ¼ 395, but with increasing Pr the differences in the logarithmic region became significant. Only Piller [19]; Satake et al [20] and Redjem-Saad et al [21] have attempted to make a comparison between turbulent pipe and channel flow DNS. Redjem-Saad et al [21] compared RMS temperature fluctuations and turbulent heat flux for 0.026 Pr 1.0 at Re t ¼ 186 with the channel flow DNS data of Kawamura et al [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%