2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43246-020-00103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High responsivity in MoS2 phototransistors based on charge trapping HfO2 dielectrics

Abstract: Abstract2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides hold a promising potential in future optoelectronic applications due to their high photoresponsivity and tunable band structure for broadband photodetection. In imaging applications, the detection of weak light signals is crucial for creating a better contrast between bright and dark pixels in order to achieve high resolution images. The photogating effect has been previously shown to offer high light sensitivities; however, the key features required to create this a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
77
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5(e)) and reaches values in excess of $420 A W À1 in two-terminal co-planar geometry. This value represents the quite higher responsivity of MoS 2 as compared to other reports 11,41,52,53 (for a comparison to literature, see the ESI S3 †) and indicates the benets of producing MoS 2 with low trap density and efficient carrier conduction. More importantly, uniformly high responsivity could be achieved for all devices throughout the centimetre-sized samples (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…5(e)) and reaches values in excess of $420 A W À1 in two-terminal co-planar geometry. This value represents the quite higher responsivity of MoS 2 as compared to other reports 11,41,52,53 (for a comparison to literature, see the ESI S3 †) and indicates the benets of producing MoS 2 with low trap density and efficient carrier conduction. More importantly, uniformly high responsivity could be achieved for all devices throughout the centimetre-sized samples (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The photogating effect relies on the trapping of the photogenerated holes at the dielectric/semiconductor interface, which results in developing a local built-in electric field that shifts the Fermi level to induce more electrons. 19,20,42 In addition, to evaluate the enhancement in photodetection with the NCFG device structure, a conventional back-gate TiN-ZrO 2 and Si-ZrO 2 device were measured and their photoresponse results can be found in Fig. 3b and c respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum change in the threshold voltage shifting was −0.92 V for 51.8 μW cm −2 which is quite a low light intensity in comparison with other MoS 2 phototransistors that have been investigated for photogating at higher optical powers. 7,20–22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In TMD-based phototransistors, photocurrent typically emerges from two different mechanisms: the photoconductive effect (PCE), where light-induced formation of electron–hole pairs leads to increased charge carrier density and electrical conductivity; and the photogating effect (PGE), where the light-induced filling or depletion of localized states causes a shift in the Fermi energy [ 19 , 20 ]. These two mechanisms can be distinguished by their different dependence on the gate voltage—while PCE-generated photocurrent typically depends weakly on V g , PGE produces a gate-voltage-dependent photocurrent proportional to the out-of-plane transconductance [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%