2013
DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-12-015.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Vertical Profiles of X-Band Polarimetric Radar Observables during Snowfall in the Swiss Alps

Abstract: An X-band polarimetric radar was deployed in the eastern Swiss Alps at an altitude of 2133 m. Radar measurements were complemented with several weather stations deployed in an altitude range from 1500 to 3100 m as well as with a fixed GPS ground station that was used to infer integrated water vapor estimates. Around 8000 vertical profiles of polarimetric radar observables above the melting layer collected during two months are analyzed. First, the behavior of the mean profiles of reflectivity at horizontal pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends were observed when a different hydrometeor classification method was employed (i.e., the method of Dolan and Rutledge, 2009, not shown here). The relation between riming and snowfall intensity was also qualitatively observed by Schneebeli et al (2013) in a different location in the Swiss Alps. It must be noted that these results rely on radar-based hydrometeor classification (i.e., indirect measurements), and also that riming does not exclude the occurrence of other microphysical processes, notably aggregation.…”
Section: Riming and Snowfall Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar trends were observed when a different hydrometeor classification method was employed (i.e., the method of Dolan and Rutledge, 2009, not shown here). The relation between riming and snowfall intensity was also qualitatively observed by Schneebeli et al (2013) in a different location in the Swiss Alps. It must be noted that these results rely on radar-based hydrometeor classification (i.e., indirect measurements), and also that riming does not exclude the occurrence of other microphysical processes, notably aggregation.…”
Section: Riming and Snowfall Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The peak of K dp , below altitudes of higher Z DR and above altitudes of higher Z H , is a well-known but still not completely understood signature observed during snowfall (Kennedy and Rutledge, 2011;Bechini et al, 2013;Schneebeli et al, 2013;Andric et al, 2013;Hubbert et al, 2014). The proximity of this signature with respect to the −15 • C level (blue line in Fig.…”
Section: Intermediate Level Of Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This system, described in Schneebeli et al (2013) and in Scipion et al (2013), is a scanning dual-polarization Doppler radar. During its operation period at DDU, it was mainly collecting data at 75 m radial resolution and a maximum radial distance of 30 km, mostly conducting different types of scans within a repeating scanning sequence of 5 min: (i) plan position indicator (PPI) scans, i.e., quasi-horizontal slices of the atmosphere, (ii) range height indicator (RHI) scans, i.e., vertical slices of the atmosphere, and (iii) static vertical profiles, such as the ones performed by the MRR.…”
Section: Apres3 Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also used were data from a METEK GmbH micro rain radar (MRR Peters et al, 2002Tridon et al, 2011) within the network, which provided vertical profiles of estimated DSDs recorded with 100 m vertical resolution and 10 s integration time. MXPol, a transportable Doppler dual-polarisation weather radar (for instrument details see Schneebeli et al, 2013), was located to the north-east of the disdrometer network. In 2013, MXPol recorded "stacked" plan position indicator (PPI) scans above the Parsivel network at elevations of 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 20 • above horizontal, with a return time of about 6 min.…”
Section: Double-moment Dsd Normalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%