2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-013-1912-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution sea wind hindcasts over the Mediterranean area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PBL plays a major role in simulating surface winds (Stensrud, 2007;Kwun et al, 2009;Santos-Alamillos et al, 2013;Menendez et al, 2014). Nowadays, there are many different approximations to account for the relevant subgrid processes that lead to different PBL formations.…”
Section: Pbl Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PBL plays a major role in simulating surface winds (Stensrud, 2007;Kwun et al, 2009;Santos-Alamillos et al, 2013;Menendez et al, 2014). Nowadays, there are many different approximations to account for the relevant subgrid processes that lead to different PBL formations.…”
Section: Pbl Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, they are used in the so-called hindcast simulations, which combine the reliability of reanalysis products with the high resolution provided by RCMs. Studies focusing specifically on wind have been one of the applications of such types of simulations (Jiménez et al, 2010;Jerez and Trigo, 2013;Etienne et al, 2013;García-Díez et al, 2013Menendez et al, 2014;Lorente-Plazas et al, 2015;Draxl et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The top of WRF domains is at 50 hPa: 33 eta vertical levels with 11 levels below 1000 m and the lowest one at about 23 m. The top of CHIMERE domains is at 500 hPa: 12 vertical sigma levels with 7 levels below 1000 m and the lowest one at about 21 m. For meteorological simulations, initial and global boundary conditions were taken from Global Forecasting System (GFS) operational analyses, provided by the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), at a spatial resolution of 1 • × 1 • and a temporal resolution of 6 h. Furthermore, WRF simulations were performed in 30-h blocks, starting at 18:00 Local Time (LT) of each day with the first 6 h discarded as model spin-up. Since we used the model for sensitivity tests, we prefer this run strategy to be called "reforecast" [26], in order to avoid analysis nudging that would dampen the effect of the perturbation on model parameters. The WRF physics options adopted are reported in Table 2, including the Multi-layer Building Environment Parameterization (BEP, [27]) as the urban physics option with default input values for thermal and geometric parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As inputs, the GOW Mediterranean (Reguero et al, 2012) grid (Fig. 3) with a spatial resolution of 0.18 • (20 km) and the Seawind I database (Menéndez et al, 2013) with a spatial resolution of 30 × 30 km (Fig. 1) were used.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%