2006
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.05.1750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution MR Lymphangiography in Patients with Primary and Secondary Lymphedema

Abstract: High-resolution MR lymphangiography is safe, is technically feasible, and has the potential to become a diagnostic imaging tool for patients with lymphedema.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated in all four patients in this study, MRL is highly superior to lymphoscintigraphy when taking into account the detailed description, with high resolution of small lymphatic pathologies that are only a few millimetres in size and consecutive affection of the adjacent structures. Furthermore, MRL is able to delineate dermal backflow areas precisely, indicating a lymphatic outflow obstruction [11][12][13]. Additionally, similar to a lymphoscintigraphy study, it is possible to obtain functional information for a MRL study, since the image acquisitions of the T 1 weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence are obtained sequentially 15, 25, 35, 45 and 55 min after intracutaneous contrast material injection [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As demonstrated in all four patients in this study, MRL is highly superior to lymphoscintigraphy when taking into account the detailed description, with high resolution of small lymphatic pathologies that are only a few millimetres in size and consecutive affection of the adjacent structures. Furthermore, MRL is able to delineate dermal backflow areas precisely, indicating a lymphatic outflow obstruction [11][12][13]. Additionally, similar to a lymphoscintigraphy study, it is possible to obtain functional information for a MRL study, since the image acquisitions of the T 1 weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence are obtained sequentially 15, 25, 35, 45 and 55 min after intracutaneous contrast material injection [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, MRL is able to delineate dermal backflow areas precisely, indicating a lymphatic outflow obstruction [11][12][13]. Additionally, similar to a lymphoscintigraphy study, it is possible to obtain functional information for a MRL study, since the image acquisitions of the T 1 weighted 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence are obtained sequentially 15, 25, 35, 45 and 55 min after intracutaneous contrast material injection [11][12][13]. As seen N/A, not applicable; T 1 sequence (after intracutaneous contrast material injection at the region of the forefoot).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23,24 However, most of these lymphotropic contrast agents are still in the preclinical phase or under development, and validation in larger studies is needed before their routine use in clinical practice. 24 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%