2017
DOI: 10.3161/15081109acc2017.19.2.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution MaxEnt Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Maternity Colonies of the Barbastelle Bat Barbastella barbastellus (Schreber, 1774) in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that roost trees were located significantly closer to water than random trees. The association with water has been shown elsewhere for barbastelle roosts using habitat suitability (Gottwald et al, 2017) and has also been observed in several other temperate forest-dwelling bats (Kalcounis-Ruppell et al, 2005;O'Keefe et al, 2009;Culina et al, 2017). Rivers that flowed through each study site were prominent features in the landscape and are probably used as flight corridors and drinking sites by bats.…”
Section: Distance To Watersupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We found that roost trees were located significantly closer to water than random trees. The association with water has been shown elsewhere for barbastelle roosts using habitat suitability (Gottwald et al, 2017) and has also been observed in several other temperate forest-dwelling bats (Kalcounis-Ruppell et al, 2005;O'Keefe et al, 2009;Culina et al, 2017). Rivers that flowed through each study site were prominent features in the landscape and are probably used as flight corridors and drinking sites by bats.…”
Section: Distance To Watersupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, the models in this study only define suitable habitat for general summer use. Modeling migration corridors for both long‐ and short‐distance migrants and modeling ideal maternity habitat through female‐only models during summer may find additional areas of habitat (Hayes et al 2015, Gottwald et al 2017, Wieringa et al 2021). Lastly, testing the same variable distances for all 3 species (0.1 km, 0.5 km, 1 km), although beneficial for maintaining consistency in the analysis and with previously published HSMs (Bellamy et al 2013), may be too small for larger ranges in species‐specific variation in habitat usage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our baseline model identified temperature seasonality (bio04) as the most influential variable for the potential future distribution of M. religiosa in Hesse. It is defined as the standard deviation of the monthly temperature averages throughout the year (Xu et al, 2013;Grünig et al, 2017), and larger values indicate greater temperature differences between the months. 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maxent is a popular method for species distribution modeling and is able to work with presence-only data (Elith et al, 2011;Merow et al, 2013;Amici et al, 2015). To select the explanatory variables for the baseline model of the current distribution of M. religiosa, we applied the function MaxentVariableSelection (Jueterbock et al, 2016;Gottwald et al, 2017;Steger et al, 2020) with the following settings: (1) a contribution threshold for inclusion in the model of 2 %, a value that reflects the importance of environmental variables in limiting the distribution of the species;…”
Section: Statistical Analyses and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%