2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution lithographic biofabrication of hydrogels with complex microchannels from low-temperature-soluble gelatin bioresins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These soft gels are also likely a consequence of the higher sol‐fraction after crosslinking, since unmodified gelMA prepared at the same prepolymer concentration with no optical tuning resulted in stiffer gels (5.04 ± 0.10 kPa) (Figure S11, Supporting Information). Notably, both gelMA resins were shown to remain biodegradable after the photocrosslinking process, as found upon exposure to a collagenase‐laden media, [ 61 ] an essential characteristic of biocompatible materials used in the field of tissue engineering (Figure S12, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These soft gels are also likely a consequence of the higher sol‐fraction after crosslinking, since unmodified gelMA prepared at the same prepolymer concentration with no optical tuning resulted in stiffer gels (5.04 ± 0.10 kPa) (Figure S11, Supporting Information). Notably, both gelMA resins were shown to remain biodegradable after the photocrosslinking process, as found upon exposure to a collagenase‐laden media, [ 61 ] an essential characteristic of biocompatible materials used in the field of tissue engineering (Figure S12, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike extrusion bioprinting where the GelMA-based bioinks (including our micropore-forming bioinks) could be pre-stored at a lower temperature (e.g., 4 °C) to first allow gelation to enable faithful bioprinting, the stability of the emulsions in the micropore-forming bioinks becomes a critical factor in DLP bioprinting since they would have to be maintained in the liquid state (e.g., room temperature) during the entire process to enable layer-by-layer biofabrication. [36,39,59] Therefore, the stability of our micropore-forming bioinks was evaluated using fluorescently labeled GelMA [27] (Figure S15, Supporting Information). It could be found that an apparent phase-separation started to occur in the micropore-forming bioink made of HF-GelMA (10 wt.%) and PEO (1 wt.%, MW: 1 × 10 5 Da) after ≈10 min of mixing at room temperature, consistent with our previous formulation reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that gelatins derived from different sources offer unique material properties. [ 38,39 ] For example, bovine and porcine gelatins have higher tensile strengths and percent elongation values compared to fish gelatin. Fish gelatin has a much lower gelation temperature than those of other species due to fish gelatin having lower concentrations of proline and hydroxyproline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies tried to pattern GelMA hydrogels using DMDs ( Grogan et al, 2013 ; Wang et al, 2018 , 2021 ), but this is, to our knowledge, the first example where the stiffness of GelMA has been patterned using projected visible light. Several studies have successfully 3D printed precise structures with GelMA hydrogels using visible light ( Lim et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2018 ; Kumar et al, 2021 ; Levato et al, 2021 ), but without trying to control at the same time the stiffness of the scaffolds. In terms of achievable gradients, our system can generate stiffness gradients with slopes ranging from several hundreds of kPa/mm (at boundaries between areas of defined stiffness) to a few kPa/mm, which spans physiological and pathological gradients in tissues and at tissue interfaces ( Vincent et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photopatterning the stiffness of GelMA hydrogels with UV light has been extensively studied using some of the methods cited above ( O’Connell et al, 2018 ; Ko et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Kim et al, 2020 ; Lavrentieva et al, 2020 ). To date, several studies have stiffness-patterned hydrogels through visible light ( Rape et al, 2015 ; He et al, 2018 ) and used projection-based patterning of GelMA ( Levato et al, 2021 ), but to our knowledge, this is the first study employing visible light projection-based patterning to control and pattern the stiffness of GelMA hydrogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%