2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution imaging of a vineyard in south of France using ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that respect, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) are non-invasive geophysical techniques which can be used to characterize the shallow subsurface properties at the field scale with high temporal and spatial resolutions (André et al, 2012;Cockx et al, 2007;Huisman et al, 2003;Jonard et al, 2011;Lambot et al, 2008;Slob et al, 2010). EMI is sensitive to soil electrical conductivity, which is mainly affected by soil water content (SWC), clay content, and salinity (Corwin and Lesch, 2005;Friedman, 2005), while GPR is sensitive to both soil electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity, the latter primarily depending on SWC (Topp et al, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that respect, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) are non-invasive geophysical techniques which can be used to characterize the shallow subsurface properties at the field scale with high temporal and spatial resolutions (André et al, 2012;Cockx et al, 2007;Huisman et al, 2003;Jonard et al, 2011;Lambot et al, 2008;Slob et al, 2010). EMI is sensitive to soil electrical conductivity, which is mainly affected by soil water content (SWC), clay content, and salinity (Corwin and Lesch, 2005;Friedman, 2005), while GPR is sensitive to both soil electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity, the latter primarily depending on SWC (Topp et al, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pioneering research by Bramley and Hamilton (2004) and Bramley (2005) not only highlighted the magnitude and extent of the spatial variability of yield in some Australian vineyards (of between 4.5 and 7.3 ha) but also emphasized the significant influence of soils in driving yield differences. The need to assess spatial variations in soil properties has driven the development and application of direct (so-called "proximal") geophysical sensing, particularly for measuring soil apparent electrical conductivity by means of either electrical resistivity surveys and/or electro-magnetic induction scans (EMI) (Lamb et al, 2005;Morari et al, 2009;Taylor et al, 2009;Trought and Bramley, 2011;Fulton et al, 2011;André et al, 2012;Martini et al, 2013; al., 2013; Priori et al, 2013a, b;Rossi et al, 2013;Brillante et al, 2014). Moreover, the need to assess spatial variation in grapevine biomass and canopy properties, or to map terroir units or to identify vines, has driven the development, acquisition and processing of remote-sensing data.…”
Section: General Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensing results are often limited to qualitative information and geophysical sensing results are ambiguous, making reliable quantification of sensing information still a major challenge (Werban et al, 2013). Indeed, geophysical surveys have mainly resulted in delineating within-field zones (Lamb et al, 2005;Taylor et al, 2009;Costantini et al, 2010;André et al, 2012;Martini et al, 2013;Priori et al, 2013a, b), rather than predicting soil properties, such as clay content (Rodríguez-Pérez et al, 2011;Andrenelli et al, 2013), extractable Na + and Mg 2+ contents (Rodríguez-Pérez et al, 2011), or soil moisture (Brillante et al, 2014). Apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) values are "affected by various soil properties in a complex manner and it is difficult to discriminate the weight that each soil parameter has on the final apparent measured ECa" (Martini et al, 2013) so that the Pearson's correlation coefficient is often not significantly high between ECa and soil parameters such as clay content or gravimetric water content.…”
Section: Proxy Measurements Of Terroir and Their Statistical Processimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research reports have shown that resistivity could be used to map permanent soil properties at farm scale (André et al 2012;Buvat et al 2014). In some cases, soil texture can dominate the resistivity pattern overshadowing soil structure and water-related properties (Banton et al 1997).…”
Section: Principles Of Geophysical Techniques For Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%